2001
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/26.9.1187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateralization of Olfactory Cognitive Functions: Effects of Rhinal Side of Stimulation

Abstract: This study investigated differences in olfactory cognitive functions, in 40 healthy young right-handed participants, with respect to side of rhinal stimulation. The targeted functions were: perceived familiarity, episodic recognition memory, free identification and repetition priming in identification. The results showed that odors presented to the right nostril were rated as more familiar than odors presented to the left nostril and also showed significant effects of repetition priming in identification. Howe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
15
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Greater activation of the right OFC and the right PC was observed when the participants evaluated odor familiarity compared with when they detected odors (Royet et al, 1999, 2011; Plailly et al, 2005). The lateralization of this memory process (Royet and Plailly, 2004) was consistent with the higher familiarity of odors presented to the right nostril than those presented to the left nostril (Broman et al, 2001). This could also explain the right hemisphere lateralization of the odor process observed in the first studies when odorants were passively perceived because the odorants were familiar and could have automatically triggered recognition (e.g., Zatorre et al, 1992; Yousem et al, 1997; Sobel et al, 1998; Savic et al, 2000; Poellinger et al, 2001).…”
Section: Autobiographical Approaches For Studying the Neural Basis Ofsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Greater activation of the right OFC and the right PC was observed when the participants evaluated odor familiarity compared with when they detected odors (Royet et al, 1999, 2011; Plailly et al, 2005). The lateralization of this memory process (Royet and Plailly, 2004) was consistent with the higher familiarity of odors presented to the right nostril than those presented to the left nostril (Broman et al, 2001). This could also explain the right hemisphere lateralization of the odor process observed in the first studies when odorants were passively perceived because the odorants were familiar and could have automatically triggered recognition (e.g., Zatorre et al, 1992; Yousem et al, 1997; Sobel et al, 1998; Savic et al, 2000; Poellinger et al, 2001).…”
Section: Autobiographical Approaches For Studying the Neural Basis Ofsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Moreover, having poor odor threshold is likely to hamper the development of odor identification and discrimination ability. Finally, while our findings suggest a lefthemisphere advantage for odor identification and discrimination, contrary to the findings by others (see, for example, Broman et al 2001;Royet and Plailly 2004), the opportunity to fully understand the lateralization of olfactory function remains.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The most consistent observation (cf. Broman et al 2001) has been of a lefthemisphere advantage in odor identification and has been observed in healthy participants (Herz et al 1999;Homewood and Stevenson 2001), split-brain patients (Gordon and Sperry 1969), and patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (Hudry et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In odor memory research, only two studies have looked at memory awareness for odors. One study investigated how this measure was associated with left and right hemisphere functioning (Broman et al 2001). The other showed how an age-related decrease in recollective experience of odors could be tied to poorer odor-naming ability among the elderly .…”
Section: Memory Awarenessmentioning
confidence: 99%