1999
DOI: 10.1080/135765099396999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laterality of Hand, Foot, Eye, and Ear in Twins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Between 10 to 25% of MZ twins are discordant for handedness (Reiss et al, 1999;Ross et al, 1999;Sicotte et al, 1999). While both the RS and D/C models can explain discordant handedness in MZ twin pairs, both models still predict greater concordance in MZ than DZ twins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Between 10 to 25% of MZ twins are discordant for handedness (Reiss et al, 1999;Ross et al, 1999;Sicotte et al, 1999). While both the RS and D/C models can explain discordant handedness in MZ twin pairs, both models still predict greater concordance in MZ than DZ twins.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hand preference is strongly -although not perfectly -correlated with foot preference, which is also strongly lateralized towards the right in humans at a population level 16,17 . Although left-footedness may be more closely linked to a reorganization of certain cortical functions than left-handedness 18 , it is not used as an exclusion criterion in neuroscience studies and has not been as extensively studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The prevalences of left-handedness and left-footedness in the maternal association group according to four age classes, that is, 1-3, 4-6, 7-9, and 10-15, were 32.6% (191/585), 23 13.5% (43/319), and 14.1% (44/313) for left-footedness, respectively. These prevalences decreased until 7-9 and then stabilized after 7-9.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these studies, that of Reiss et al (23) showed no difference in the prevalence of left-footedness of twins compared with that of singletons. It also showed no difference in prevalence between MZ and DZ twins, although the sample size was 100 pairs.…”
Section: Prevalences Of Handedness and Footednessmentioning
confidence: 99%