1959
DOI: 10.1190/1.1438609
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral Velocity Variations Near Boreholes

Abstract: Difficulties occur in obtaining accurate two‐receiver velocity logs in formations sensitive either to damage by exposure to drilling mud or to mechanical stress relief. Some shales are so altered by the drilling operation that their elastic properties are modified. Vertical velocity measured immediately adjacent the boreface is lower than if it were measured at a greater radial distance from the bore. These damaged shales require relatively deep penetration by the acoustic signal; consequently, the transmitter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1960
1960
1989
1989

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 14-to 16-ft (4.3-to 4.9-m) P-wave ITT averages about I JLs/ft (3.3 JLs/m) less than the 3to 5-ft (0.9-to 1.5-m) P-wave ITT, while S-wave ITT is normally 1 to 3 JLs/ft (3.3 to 9.8 JLs/m) less than the 3-to 5-ft (0.9-to 1.5-m) curves. These magnitudes also can be observed on the curve comparisons Similar discrepancies have been observed 19,20 in sand/shale sequences, where lower ITT on longer spacing tools is attributed to the ability of this tool to "see" beyond the shallow shale hydration effects caused by the drilling process. The offset between short-and long-spaced curves is somewhat surprising in the test well because it occurs in dense carbonates and sandstones as well as in fairly high-velocity siltstones and shales.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The 14-to 16-ft (4.3-to 4.9-m) P-wave ITT averages about I JLs/ft (3.3 JLs/m) less than the 3to 5-ft (0.9-to 1.5-m) P-wave ITT, while S-wave ITT is normally 1 to 3 JLs/ft (3.3 to 9.8 JLs/m) less than the 3-to 5-ft (0.9-to 1.5-m) curves. These magnitudes also can be observed on the curve comparisons Similar discrepancies have been observed 19,20 in sand/shale sequences, where lower ITT on longer spacing tools is attributed to the ability of this tool to "see" beyond the shallow shale hydration effects caused by the drilling process. The offset between short-and long-spaced curves is somewhat surprising in the test well because it occurs in dense carbonates and sandstones as well as in fairly high-velocity siltstones and shales.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Tw(• receiver CVL's with long spacing between transmitter and first receiver should be used in measuring the velocity to avoid the effects of shale damage on velocity logs (Hicks, 1959). Tw(• receiver CVL's with long spacing between transmitter and first receiver should be used in measuring the velocity to avoid the effects of shale damage on velocity logs (Hicks, 1959).…”
Section: Outlining Shale Masses By Recording In a Deep Hole In A Shalmentioning
confidence: 99%