2011
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0b013e318211721f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral Supraorbital Approach vs Pterional Approach: An Anatomic Qualitative and Quantitative Evaluation

Abstract: From an anatomic point of view, both approaches provide similar exposure to the sellar, suprasellar, and anterior communicating artery areas. The pterional approach provides better exposure of the retrosellar area. The ability to operate in the retrosellar area, as judged by our model, was higher with the pterional than with the lateral supraorbital approach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
34
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lateral supraorbital approach provides a longer route to the basilar tip and a lesser exposure volume, and consequently needs more frontal lobe retraction before reaching the chiasmatic and carotid cisterns7). However, in the lateral supraorbital approach, the temporal muscle splitting is limited to its superior and anterior part, because the small skin incision never descends in front of the ear to the level of the zygomatic arch; thus, any injury of the upper branches of the facial nerve can be avoided by detaching the one layer skin-galea-muscle flap from the bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lateral supraorbital approach provides a longer route to the basilar tip and a lesser exposure volume, and consequently needs more frontal lobe retraction before reaching the chiasmatic and carotid cisterns7). However, in the lateral supraorbital approach, the temporal muscle splitting is limited to its superior and anterior part, because the small skin incision never descends in front of the ear to the level of the zygomatic arch; thus, any injury of the upper branches of the facial nerve can be avoided by detaching the one layer skin-galea-muscle flap from the bone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has the limitation on the sylvian dissection at the level of the limen insulae, so more brain retractions are needed to approach the proximal ICA or basilar artery area [9]. Consequentially, the two approaches have similar surgical exposure in the sellar, suprasellar and the anterior communicating artery space, but the standard pterional approach is considered more appropriate for approaching the retrosellar area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), the degree of visualization and the quality of the surgical access. We used the Surgical Exposure Grading System described by Salma et al 9 to evaluate each approach ( …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acomm 3 3 3 3 3 3 A 1 5 5 5 5 3 4 A 2 2 3 3 4 3 5 R A H 2 3 3 4 3 4 I C A 4 4 3 4 3 4 A1 and A2 = the fist and second segments of the anterior cerebral artery, Acomm = anterior communicating artery complex, ICA = internal carotid arteries (ICA), RAH = recurrent arteries of Heubner. Exposure grades have been modified from Salma et al 9 See Table 1.…”
Section: Pterional Keyhole Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%