Lateral spreading and its impacts in urban areas in the 2010–2011 Christchurch earthquakes

Abstract

In the 4 September 2010 (M W 07.1) and 22 February 2011 (M W 06.2) earthquakes, widespread liquefaction and lateral spreading occurred throughout Christchurch and the town of Kaiapoi. The severe soil liquefaction and lateral spreading in particular caused extensive and heavy damage to residential buildings, Christchurch business district (CBD) buildings, bridges and water supply and wastewater systems of Christchurch. After the earthquake, comprehensive field investigations and inspections were conducted to document the liquefaction-induced land damage and lateral spreading displacements and their impact on buildings and infrastructure. The results of ground surveying measurements of lateral spreads at approximately 120 locations along the Avon River, Kaiapoi River and streams in the affected area reveal permanent lateral ground displacements at the banks of up to 2Á3 m that progressed inland as far as 200Á250 m from the waterway, causing significant damage to structures located within the spreading zone. Different features and magnitudes of spreading were identified, which were often affected by a complex interplay of ground conditions, topography, meandering river geometry and local depositional environment. The spreading was characterised by very large and highly non-uniform ground deformation causing stretching of building foundations and the buildings themselves. Road bridges suffered a characteristic spreading-induced damage mechanism including back-rotation of the abutments associated with deck pinning and damage at the top of the abutment piles. The wastewater system of Christchurch was hit particularly hard by the liquefaction and lateral spreading, and approximately 60% of the damaged pipes of the potable water system were located in areas of severe liquefaction and lateral spreading.

Urbanisation and earthquake disturbance influence microbial nutrient limitation in streams

“…Earthquakes alter stream hydrology, cause lateral ground displacement, bank slumping and may cause liquefaction (Wang & Manga, 2010;Cubrinovski et al, 2012;Wells et al, 2013), all of which are likely to influence biogeochemical processes. In highly urbanised areas, these effects are exaggerated by damage to infrastructure, including sewerage networks, leading to inputs of sewage from tanks or treatments plants, and probably affecting microbial functions.…”

Fines-content effects on liquefaction hazard evaluation for infrastructure in Christchurch, New Zealand

“…The 2010-2011 CES induced widespread, severe, and recurrent liquefaction throughout the city of Christchurch, resulting in largescale damage to civil infrastructure (e.g., [17,18,24,19]). The CES initiated with the M w 7.1, 4 September 2010 Darfield earthquake and was punctuated by the M w 6.2, 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, each of which induced pervasive and damaging liquefaction.…”

Geospatial tools for Community Engagement in the Christchurch Rebuild, New Zealand

“…1) and damage to land. The severity of damage was largely attributed to liquefaction, aggravated by near-surface geological conditions (Brackley, 2012) and causing the collapse of infrastructure and buildings (Cubrinovski, Robinson, Taylor, Hughes, & Orense, 2012). Four years after February 2011, EQC (Earthquake Commission) has paid out about $8.3 billion NZD in residential claims, and private insurers paid about $13.9 billion to settle commercial and residential claims (CERA, 2013;Parker & Steenkamp, 2013).…”