1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1987.tb10612.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral proton conduction at a lipid/water interface. Effect of lipid nature and ionic content of the aqueous phase

Abstract: Fast lateral proton conduction was observed along the lipidiwater interface using a fluorescence technique. This conduction can be detected for a large number of lipids, both phospholipids and glycolipids. The efficiency of the proton transfer is dependent on the molecular packing of the host lipid at a given surface pressure. The proton conduction which is present in the liquid expanded state is abolished by the transition to the liquid condensed state. The proton transfer is affected slightly by the ionic co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
28
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of the many experiments we have carried out, we reject the notion of Prats et al (11) that the ordering of water on the surface of membrane (12) has any accelerating effect on the diffusion of proton (11).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…On the basis of the many experiments we have carried out, we reject the notion of Prats et al (11) that the ordering of water on the surface of membrane (12) has any accelerating effect on the diffusion of proton (11).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Likewise we determined the H+ buffer capacity of our proteoliposomes between pH 5 and pH 8 (for experimental details see Junge et al, 1979) to be of the order of 1 mM. This higher surface concentration of protons (we observed one channel in an area of -1 /um2) in combination with the possibly enhanced H+ diffusion at the membrane surface (Prats et al, 1987) would indeed be sufficient to allow up to -1 s steady-state channel currents with a rate of 106 H+/s. The observed independence (between pH 5.5 and pH 8) of the channel unit conductance from the bulk pH is consistent with the above mechanism.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…7 An alternative view postulates that proton diffusion occurs via a hop and turn mechanism, possibly across the bulk. 2 Experimental studies of water diffusion at hydrophobic interfaces suggest diffusion coefficients for water around 10 -10 to 10 -11 cm 2 /s [8][9][10][11] compared to the bulk water coefficient of 10 -5 cm 2 /s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%