Lateral Position in Children During Head Mri Under General Anesthesia for Prevention of Upper Airway Complications

Альбокрiнов, А. А.; Фесенко, У. А.; Перова-Шаронова, В. М.; Степанишин, С. І.

doi:10.25284/2519-2078.4(89).2019.187801

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Неинвазивные способы (интраназальный, оральный, буккальный, ректальный) не используют в связи с отсутствием фармакопейных форм и их регистрации на территории ДНР. Поэтому основным путем доставки лекарственных анестезиологических средств остается парентеральный путь введения [4].…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Один из опросов анестезиологического сообщества показал, что наиболее распространенным подходом при МРТ-исследовании у детей является общая анестезия с самостоятельным дыханием или без воздуховода. В процессе МРТ-исследования новорожденные и дети раннего возраста требуют более глубокого уровня анестезии/седации в сравнении с более старшими детьми, что может приводить к нарушению проходимости дыхательных путей при отсутствии условий для протекции органов дыхания [4].…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Choice of anesthetic support components for children during MRI procedures

Anastasov

Герасимович²,

Ovcharenko³

et al. 2020

Russian Journal of Pediatric Surgery, Anesthesia and Intensive

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction. An MRI-scan in early childhood requires anesthesia to create complete immobility of the patient due to the high incidence of artifacts with an MRI duration of 40 to 60 minutes. The purpose of the work is to select the components of anesthetic support in children from one month to three years old with MRI. Materials and methods. The object of the study was 33 patients aged one month to three years with congenital and acquired brain pathology. Anesthetic management intravenous general anesthesia without mechanical ventilation. Anesthesia in 11 (33.3%) patients of group 1 midazolam 0.5% 0.3 mg/kg, in 12 (36.4%) patients of group 2 midazolam 0.5% at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg + ketamine 5% 1.5 mg/kg, and in 10 (30.3%) patients of group 3 midazolam 0.5% at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg + propofol 2 mg/kg. Results. Group 1 patients achieved a sedation level on the RASS scale of 2.2 0.1 points with preservation of sound and tactile sensitivity, spontaneous involuntary movements limbs in 72.7% of cases. Group 2 patients had a lack of motor activity, consciousness - an assessment on the RASS scale 4.6 0.4 points, BIS 59.4 1%, increased in blood pressure by 7.3%, and normal without depression of respiratory function. Group 3 patients required careful titration of each subsequent dose, constant monitoring of breathing and hemodynamics, and, if necessary, maintaining adequate ventilation during the induction stage. Conclusion. The most rational components for anesthesia support in young children during MRI scanning are midazolam solutions at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg and ketamine at 1.5/kg.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Section: Introductionunclassified