2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93399-3_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral Modulation of Midair Ultrasound Focus for Intensified Vibrotactile Stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both detection and identification thresholds for line patterns generated through STM were found to be lower than detection thresholds for a single point generated through AM (which is consistent with prior results from Takahashi et al [18]). This result can be attributed to a number of factors, such as the change in modulation and possible constructive interference between successive focal points in STM, the stimulation of a larger surface area (which is consistent with previous findings on contact vibrotactile displays [19]), and even the fact that lines aligned with the y-axis allowed subjects to feel out the pattern with more sensitive parts of the hand than the palm (e.g., the fingertips).…”
Section: B Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Both detection and identification thresholds for line patterns generated through STM were found to be lower than detection thresholds for a single point generated through AM (which is consistent with prior results from Takahashi et al [18]). This result can be attributed to a number of factors, such as the change in modulation and possible constructive interference between successive focal points in STM, the stimulation of a larger surface area (which is consistent with previous findings on contact vibrotactile displays [19]), and even the fact that lines aligned with the y-axis allowed subjects to feel out the pattern with more sensitive parts of the hand than the palm (e.g., the fingertips).…”
Section: B Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In previous systems [22] [25] [21], a perceptible vibrotactile sensation was generated by applying an amplitude modulation of about 100-250 Hz because this method has a low acoustic power efficiency. Recently, it has been reported that a stronger stimulation is perceived by vibrating the focus position along the skin while keeping the acoustic power constant [27]. By moving the focal points around the contact surfaces of the finger and the object, our system efficiently generates a perceptible vibrotactile sensation and pressure pattern on the finger surface according to the shape of the contact surface.…”
Section: Haptic Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…250 Hz). Alternative methods include moving the point continuously, instead [14], [15]. Many focal points can be perceived simultaneously [2], but a single point can be used to create feelings of movement or shapes [16].…”
Section: B Ultrasound Haptic Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, if the hand is 60 mm from sweet spot (p = 0.6), the circle diameter would be 16 mm. The haptic circle was rendered using lateral modulation [14], [15]: one ultrasound haptic focal point traversed the circumference of the circle at 75 Hz. We found that 75 Hz offered the strongest sensation for this shape and size range.…”
Section: B Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%