1992
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199274080-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral meniscal variant with absence of the posterior coronary ligament.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
48
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Wrisberg-ligament type was described as being fairly normal in size and shape but lacking a posterior attachment other than the ligament of Wrisberg. 20 However, in 1992 Neuschwander 21 recommended that the Wrisberg-variant type should be classified as a lateral meniscal variant with absence of the posterior coronary ligament, because the Wrisberg variant differs from the other two types of discoid meniscus in that the meniscus does not have a true discoid shape. Therefore, dissected discoid lateral menisci were categorized into two types (ICDM and CDM) in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Wrisberg-ligament type was described as being fairly normal in size and shape but lacking a posterior attachment other than the ligament of Wrisberg. 20 However, in 1992 Neuschwander 21 recommended that the Wrisberg-variant type should be classified as a lateral meniscal variant with absence of the posterior coronary ligament, because the Wrisberg variant differs from the other two types of discoid meniscus in that the meniscus does not have a true discoid shape. Therefore, dissected discoid lateral menisci were categorized into two types (ICDM and CDM) in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symptoms, however, are actually highly variable, depending on the type of the discoid meniscus, its location (medial or lateral), the presence of tear, and the status of rim stability [6,13,[23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Clinical Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Caucasians populations, the incidence values vary between 0.4 and 5% [3,10,31,44]. On other hand, higher incidence rates have been reported in Indians, 5.8% [36], Koreans, 9.1-10.5% [26] and Japanese, 16.6% [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%