2009
DOI: 10.1080/00423110802673091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral load transfer and normal forces estimation for vehicle safety: experimental test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I shows that the kinetic tire friction coefficient is typically slightly lower than the static stability factor /2h (the average static stability factor among vehicle models introduced in 2003 was approximately 1.4 for passenger cars and 1.2 for SUVs [28]), and hence, the no-sliding condition should be violated before the no-rollover condition. That being said, a more realistic model including e.g., normal forces or friction forces unevenly distributed among the contact points between the tires and the road surface [29], [30], nonzero pitch or roll angles [26], or tripped rollovers [31], would complicate the analysis. Now, we will identify cornering events by observing whether either of the statistics in (2) and (5) reach some predetermined thresholds, that is, whether the driver violates the condition C : T (v, a, ω) < γ SL and T (v, 0, ω) < γ RO (6) where γ SL = c 1 · µ and γ RO = c 2 · /2h for some constants c 1 , c 2 ∈ (0, ∞).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I shows that the kinetic tire friction coefficient is typically slightly lower than the static stability factor /2h (the average static stability factor among vehicle models introduced in 2003 was approximately 1.4 for passenger cars and 1.2 for SUVs [28]), and hence, the no-sliding condition should be violated before the no-rollover condition. That being said, a more realistic model including e.g., normal forces or friction forces unevenly distributed among the contact points between the tires and the road surface [29], [30], nonzero pitch or roll angles [26], or tripped rollovers [31], would complicate the analysis. Now, we will identify cornering events by observing whether either of the statistics in (2) and (5) reach some predetermined thresholds, that is, whether the driver violates the condition C : T (v, a, ω) < γ SL and T (v, 0, ω) < γ RO (6) where γ SL = c 1 · µ and γ RO = c 2 · /2h for some constants c 1 , c 2 ∈ (0, ∞).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 In order to better represent the vehicle lateral and yaw dynamics as well as coupling of yaw-roll motion due to the transient lateral load transfer 18 during extreme maneuvers, a 9 DOF model is valid for applications which do not involve wheel lift-off.…”
Section: Vehicle Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to estimate μ max , many parameters should be observed such as side slip angle, normal and lateral forces acting on tyre, velocity of the vehicle, etc. [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Velocity of the vehicle could be observed from speedometer, rear wheel angle sensors or GPS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%