2021
DOI: 10.1007/s12070-021-02463-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral Lamella of Cribriform Plate (LLCP): A Computed Tomography Radiological Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Keros in 1962 presented a classification system to categorize the depth of olfactory fossa in three types. In Keros classification type-I, the depth of olfactory fossa is 1-3 mm, type-II 4-7 mm and type-III 8-16 mm [26]. Keros type-II is the most common type, followed by type-I and type-III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Keros in 1962 presented a classification system to categorize the depth of olfactory fossa in three types. In Keros classification type-I, the depth of olfactory fossa is 1-3 mm, type-II 4-7 mm and type-III 8-16 mm [26]. Keros type-II is the most common type, followed by type-I and type-III.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This classification is based on the angle of lateral lamella with respect to a horizontal line passing through the plane of cribriform plate. Gera classification is divided in to 3 classes; class 1 (low risk, >80 degrees), class 2 (medium risk, 45-80 degrees) and class 3 (high risk, <45 degrees) [26,28]. Therefore, CT scan in addition to the diagnosis, also helps to evaluate the depth and angle of olfactory fossa prior to surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In accordance with previous studies, Gera class II lateral lamella angles (72.3%) were the most common. Table 4 summarizes the distribution of Gera classi cation in previous reports [1,6,8,16,18,24]. In terms of gender, males had signi cantly higher angles than females, but many authors did not observe such a difference [1,8,16,18] [7,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1962, Keros et al proposed a classi cation system using the depth of the cribriform plate to determine their vulnerability to iatrogenic injuries [15]. Nevertheless, many authors emphasize that more needs to be evaluated than just the depth of the cribriform plate, since this comprises only the medial portion of the anterior skull base, whereas the lateral portion is angulated [3,6,12,13,[22][23][24]. Gera et al predicted the hypothetical iatrogenic injury risk based on the angle formed between the lateral lamella of the cribriform plate and the horizontal plane in continuation with the cribriform plate [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%