1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00234129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

25
403
3

Year Published

1974
1974
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 649 publications
(431 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
25
403
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The plot shown in the figure is obtained computationally by using (11). The resemblance to the curve actually measured by Blakemore and Tobin (1972) is amazing (compare with their Fig. 1) cell' to a single bar stimulus which was surrounded by a grating pattern.…”
Section: Computational Model Of Bar Cellssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The plot shown in the figure is obtained computationally by using (11). The resemblance to the curve actually measured by Blakemore and Tobin (1972) is amazing (compare with their Fig. 1) cell' to a single bar stimulus which was surrounded by a grating pattern.…”
Section: Computational Model Of Bar Cellssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…1, there is some neurophysiological evidence for the existence of cells which can be modelled by the above operators. (11) explains the results of an experiment described by Blakemore and Tobin (1972). They describe a 'complex cell' whose response to a bar with optimal size and orientation is inhibited by a grating pattern which covers the area outside the receptive field of the cell, defined as the region in which the cell reacts to a single bar stimulus.…”
Section: Computational Model Of Bar Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to other orientation-selective neurons, such as simple (Hubel and Wiesel 1968), complex (Hubel and Wiesel 1968), and grating (von der Heydt et al 1992) cells, the concerned type of neuron responds strongly to single bars (of appropriate size and orientation) over its CRF and shows reduced response when a grating is added to the surround. The behavior of such a cell was systematically studied by Blakemore and Tobin (1972). The suppression effect they observed was strongest when the surround grating and the optimal bar stimulus over the CRF had the same orientation and decreased when the angle between the two was increased.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, neurophysiological studies have also showed that, once a cell is activated by a stimulus in its classical receptive field (CRF), another, simultaneously presented stimulus outside that field can have an effect on the cell response (Blakemore and Tobin 1972;Knierim and van Essen 1992;Nothdurft et al 1999;Jones et al 2001). This, mostly inhibitive, effect is known as nonclassical receptive field inhibition or surround suppression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%