2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral flow immunoassay based on dual spectral-overlapped fluorescence quenching of polydopamine nanospheres for sensitive detection of sulfamethazine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elution buffer will be consumed by the matrix for 2 minutes. The pure DNA eluted by centrifugation at 16000 rpm for 2 min [5].…”
Section: Extraction Of Dna For Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The elution buffer will be consumed by the matrix for 2 minutes. The pure DNA eluted by centrifugation at 16000 rpm for 2 min [5].…”
Section: Extraction Of Dna For Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For producing various types of nanoparticles, a variety of physical, chemical, and biological processes are available, some of which are more costly, energyintensive, and possibly harmful to the environment [5]. The synthesis of green nanoparticles is an interesting topic of nanoscience and nanotechnology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, the main methods used for the analysis of SAs in animal-derived foods are high-performance liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (HPLC–MS), , immunoassay including enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), , and DNA aptamer-based methods including colorimetric, electrochemical, fluorescent, and chemiluminescent methods. Among the above methods, HPLC–MS has capability of simultaneously determining multiple SAs with high sensitivity, reliability and better reproducibility. , However, HPLC–MS methods require costly apparatus and a longer analysis time, thus making the on-site screening of SAs residues in animal-derived foods impossible. Immunoassays especially ELISA methods do not required apparatus and complicated pretreatment and have better specificity and a short detection time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunoassays especially ELISA methods do not required apparatus and complicated pretreatment and have better specificity and a short detection time. Especially, some ELISA methods previously reported are capable of simultaneously detecting multiple SAs by employing broad-specificity antibody as receptor, , which meets the requirement of on-site screening of SAs residues in animal-derived foods. However, the employment of an antibody makes immunoassays have obvious weaknesses such as the dependence on the surrounding environment, higher cost, poorer stability, and risk of a false positive result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunochromatographic assays (ICAs) have unique advantages, such as simplicity, rapidness, low cost, and ease of use. They have been widely employed for on-site detection Wang et al, 2022). In an ICA, label signal reporters are important because of detection sensitivity and selectivity .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%