2003
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0493(2003)131<0461:lbcirc>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lateral Boundary Conditions in Regional Climate Models: A Detailed Study of the Relaxation Procedure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The atmospheric variables are initialised and forced every 6 h at the lateral boundaries using the ERA-INTERIM reanalysis available at a resolution of about 80 km (Dee et al, 2011). Details of the boundary forcing can be found in Marbaix et al (2003). In all figures presented here, we show the entire domain of simulation to clearly visualize the buffer zone, which reaches approximately 100 to 200 km.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atmospheric variables are initialised and forced every 6 h at the lateral boundaries using the ERA-INTERIM reanalysis available at a resolution of about 80 km (Dee et al, 2011). Details of the boundary forcing can be found in Marbaix et al (2003). In all figures presented here, we show the entire domain of simulation to clearly visualize the buffer zone, which reaches approximately 100 to 200 km.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marbaix et al (2003) provide practical guidelines for choosing relaxation coefficients through sensitivity experiments. Orographic blending in the buffer zone, proposed by Jones et al (1995) and Hong and Juang (1998), is useful and effective in reducing systematic biases of the regional model influenced by dynamical uncertainty when steep orography appears in the buffer zone.…”
Section: Uncertainties In the Nested Rcmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Dynamical inconsistencies can arise from the lack of well-posedness of the lateral boundary conditions (Oliger and Sundström (1978), Staniforth (1997)) and mismatch between the solution of the global and regional models in the nesting region (Davies (1976), Marbaix et al (2003), Harris and Durran (2010). These inconsistencies can result in the regional and global simulations diverging toward different climate states (Jones et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%