2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent transition analysis in organizational psychology: A simplified “how to” guide by using an applied example

Abstract: Demands for more robust designs in organizational research have led to a steady increase in the number of longitudinal studies in organizational psychology (OP) journals. Similarly, the number and ways to analyze longitudinal data have also increased. In this paper, we adopt a relatively new and promising approach to help researchers analyze their longitudinal data in OP, namely latent transition analysis (LTA). We present a simplified guideline on LTA and discuss its role for OP researchers. Moreover, we demo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, MBI data were analyzed separately at each time point to decide the number of profiles to extract. Starting from two profiles, one profile at a time was added and retained if all the following criteria were satisfied: (i) its addition improved the model fit according to a bootstrapped likelihood ratio test, (ii) in the resulting model no profile included <25 nurses, (iii) the entropy of the resulting model was >0.80, which is a standard threshold indicating that the identified profiles are clearly separated from the perspective of the posterior probabilities of classification, and (iv) based on content-related considerations, ie, whether the identified profiles hold theoretical value and can be conceptually distinguished from one another (35). Profiles were interpreted according to the mean scores of each dimension, as previously reported in the literature (36).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, MBI data were analyzed separately at each time point to decide the number of profiles to extract. Starting from two profiles, one profile at a time was added and retained if all the following criteria were satisfied: (i) its addition improved the model fit according to a bootstrapped likelihood ratio test, (ii) in the resulting model no profile included <25 nurses, (iii) the entropy of the resulting model was >0.80, which is a standard threshold indicating that the identified profiles are clearly separated from the perspective of the posterior probabilities of classification, and (iv) based on content-related considerations, ie, whether the identified profiles hold theoretical value and can be conceptually distinguished from one another (35). Profiles were interpreted according to the mean scores of each dimension, as previously reported in the literature (36).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, to assess how stable the help-seeking classes were across early and mid-pandemic, class similarity was tested using configural, structural, and distributional tests of similarity (Morin et al, 2020). Third, to analyze changes in help-seeking between early and mid-pandemic, transitions between the help-seeking classes over time were analyzed in a combined Latent Transition Analysis (LTA) model (citation omitted; Morin et al, 2020;Zyberaj et al, 2022). Finally, to address the second and third research questions, predictors and mental health covariates were added to the model using the manual three step procedure (Morin et al, 2020).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%