2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2015.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent trait cortisol (LTC) levels: Reliability, validity, and stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low reliability is highly likely for the studies included in this review, given the high prevalence of 1-day saliva collection protocols. Along with short-term reliability issues, the long-term stability of diurnal cortisol measures is also likely to impact on results, and there is a growing literature to suggest that this is low [17]. For example, Ross et al [121] analysed visit-to-visit cortisol stability for the diurnal cortisol profile in a population of 46 healthy adults, providing 3-day cortisol profile samples at 2.5 monthly visits over 8 months and found only low-modest intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for the cortisol awakening response (ICC 0.219), the diurnal slope (ICC 0.473) and the area under the curve (ICC 0.556), with even lower stability at the individual level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Low reliability is highly likely for the studies included in this review, given the high prevalence of 1-day saliva collection protocols. Along with short-term reliability issues, the long-term stability of diurnal cortisol measures is also likely to impact on results, and there is a growing literature to suggest that this is low [17]. For example, Ross et al [121] analysed visit-to-visit cortisol stability for the diurnal cortisol profile in a population of 46 healthy adults, providing 3-day cortisol profile samples at 2.5 monthly visits over 8 months and found only low-modest intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for the cortisol awakening response (ICC 0.219), the diurnal slope (ICC 0.473) and the area under the curve (ICC 0.556), with even lower stability at the individual level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is likely to impact on a priori decisions about the primary measurement parameter of interest, on hypotheses about directions of change and on conclusions about efficacy, target engagement and mechanisms of action. As well as these challenges, there are concerns in the literature about the long-term stability of this biomarker over periods of greater than 1 month [17], as well as concerns about its reliability in the shorter term due to day-to-day state effects [18] and the effects of non-compliance [19]. Concerns have also been raised about the responsiveness of the biomarker and how different contexts and populations may impact on this [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for the current study was drawn from the second time point of a longitudinal study examining adjustment during the transition from high school into college (see Doane et al, 2015). Seventy-six older adolescents ( M age = 18.53, SD = .37; 24% male) were assessed during the fall of their first semester of college.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, among the diurnal cortisol indicators studied in the literature (e.g., CAR, diurnal slope, and AUCg), AUCg is evidenced to be the most stable index, demonstrating the least day-to-day variability (followed by diurnal slope and CAR). 1921 The stability of AUCg makes it a good candidate to represent individuals’ trait-like characteristics. Third, AUCg has been associated with the development of MDD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%