1992
DOI: 10.3758/bf03327166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent inhibition in preweanling rats

Abstract: Two experiments describe a latent inhibition effect in preweanling rats. Subjects were trained with a light-tone compound conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with a footshock unconditioned stimulus. Experiment 1 tested 17-and 21-day-old rats and Experiment 2 tested 18-day-old rats. In each experiment, rat pups given nonreinforced preexposure to the CS expreBSed le88 conditioned fear, as indexed by a suppre88ion in general activity during the CS, than did same-age control rats given no preexposure. The results are… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The well-known phenomenon of latent inhibition, for example, occurs when prior independent experience with the CS diminishes the effectiveness of subsequent CS–US pairings to establish a learned association (Lubow, 1973). Latent inhibition has been demonstrated in rats after the time of weaning (about 21 days old) and has been reported as early as 17–18 days of age (Kraemer & Randall, 1992; Rudy, 1994) or even 10 days of age (Hoffman & Spear, 1989) under certain conditions. Some reports have suggested, though, that preexposures may have the reverse effect of facilitating conditioning in younger animals (Kucharski & Spear, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-known phenomenon of latent inhibition, for example, occurs when prior independent experience with the CS diminishes the effectiveness of subsequent CS–US pairings to establish a learned association (Lubow, 1973). Latent inhibition has been demonstrated in rats after the time of weaning (about 21 days old) and has been reported as early as 17–18 days of age (Kraemer & Randall, 1992; Rudy, 1994) or even 10 days of age (Hoffman & Spear, 1989) under certain conditions. Some reports have suggested, though, that preexposures may have the reverse effect of facilitating conditioning in younger animals (Kucharski & Spear, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the 10-day-old rats, however, the results depended on the amount of preexposure given—a facilitation of conditioning was observed following 15 preexposure trials, and an impairment in conditioning after 45 preexposure trials. One study that did not reveal an effect of age on latent inhibition in rats was reported by Kraemer and Randall (1992, Experiment 1). They gave 17- and 21-day-old rats trials in which a light-tone compound CS was paired with footshock after either 20 or 0 preexposures to the compound CS alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%