Proceedings of the 2014 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining 2014
DOI: 10.1137/1.9781611973440.52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent Factor Transition for Dynamic Collaborative Filtering

Abstract: User preferences change over time and capturing such changes is essential for developing accurate recommender systems. Despite its importance, only a few works in collaborative filtering have addressed this issue. In this paper, we consider evolving preferences and we model user dynamics by introducing and learning a transition matrix for each user's latent vectors between consecutive time windows. Intuitively, the transition matrix for a user summarizes the time-invariant pattern of the evolution for the user… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each user u is associated with a sequence of some items from I, S u = (S u 1 , · · · , S u |S u | ), where S u i ∈ I. The index t for S u t denotes the order in which an action occurs in the sequence S u , not the absolute timestamp as in temporal recommendation like [14,31,34]. Given all users' sequences S u , the goal is to recommend each user a list of items that maximize her/his future needs, by considering both general preferences and sequential patterns.…”
Section: Top-n Sequential Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each user u is associated with a sequence of some items from I, S u = (S u 1 , · · · , S u |S u | ), where S u i ∈ I. The index t for S u t denotes the order in which an action occurs in the sequence S u , not the absolute timestamp as in temporal recommendation like [14,31,34]. Given all users' sequences S u , the goal is to recommend each user a list of items that maximize her/his future needs, by considering both general preferences and sequential patterns.…”
Section: Top-n Sequential Recommendationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…two important lines of work that seek to mine users' interaction histories: temporal recommendation and sequential recommendation. Temporal recommendation [17,29,31,35] focuses on modeling absolute timestamps to capture the temporal dynamics of users and items. For example, the popularity of an item might change during different time slots, or users' average ratings might increase or decrease over time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kannan [20] proposed a bounded matrix factorization method which imposed a lower and an upper bound on every estimated missing element of the rating matrix. The matrix factorization is quite a flexible method, that it allows incorporation of additional information, such as time factor [24,9,49,36], geographical information [32,50,13,33] and social information [40,8,51,46]. For instance, Koren [24] investigated the temporal dynamics of customer preferences and modeled the temporal dynamics along the whole time period.…”
Section: Single-criteria Recommender Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%