2019
DOI: 10.1134/s0362119719050141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent Components of Event-Related Potentials in a Visual Cued Go/NoGo Task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This task was used in a set of previous studies. 10,20,32,33 The test compromises 400 trials, of which each consists of a pair of consecutively presented visual stimuli (animals, plants, and humans). In Go-trials (animal–animal), a picture of an animal is followed by a picture of an animal, and the participant is asked to press a button.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This task was used in a set of previous studies. 10,20,32,33 The test compromises 400 trials, of which each consists of a pair of consecutively presented visual stimuli (animals, plants, and humans). In Go-trials (animal–animal), a picture of an animal is followed by a picture of an animal, and the participant is asked to press a button.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied an established visual continuous performance test (VCPT) (Grane et al, 2016;Müller et al, 2019;Ponomarev et al, 2019), which is a classical cued Go/NoGo task. The test lasts 22 mins and comprises 400 trials, each consisting of a pair of sequentially presented visual stimuli.…”
Section: Go/nogo Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As neurophysiological measures, we looked at the amplitudes and latencies of four previously described and commonly used ERP components in ADHD research: cueP3, CNV, N2d, and P3d (Grane et al, 2016;Müller et al, 2019;Ponomarev et al, 2019;Kaiser et al, 2020). The presentation of an animal as the cue stimulus indicates a potentially upcoming Go stimulus, requiring an active button press and puts the participant in a state of increased alertness.…”
Section: Go/nogo Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several computational approaches of BSS were implemented in ERP research, using the following models: a linear instantaneous mixing model [3][4][5][6][7], a parallel factorial analysis (PARAFAC) model [8][9][10], a shiftinvariant PARAFAC model (ShiftCP) [11]. These and many other studies have shown that the use of BSS methods makes it possible to identify functionally different components of the ERPs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter cases, BSS approaches are usually based on modeling the well-known property of person-toperson variability of ERPs (for example, see [7]). Our previous studies have also shown that PARAFAC is an appropriate tool for identifying common features of ERP source signals at the group level [9,10]. Using this type of analysis it is possible to reveal the hidden components of the ERP, which are difficult to observe with traditional approaches, such as group averaging or analysis of variance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%