2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101747
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latent Class Cluster Analysis: Selecting the number of clusters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A known limitation of latent class analysis for cluster analysis is that it is computationally expensive, which might be inconvenient with large datasets. 48 Moreover, selecting the number of clusters is a challenging task involving inevitable subjective analytical choices. 48 With the principal component analysis method, however, we reproduced the two most commonly reported clusters of multimorbidity (mental health disorders and cardiometabolic disease), which shows the strength of the principal component analysis method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A known limitation of latent class analysis for cluster analysis is that it is computationally expensive, which might be inconvenient with large datasets. 48 Moreover, selecting the number of clusters is a challenging task involving inevitable subjective analytical choices. 48 With the principal component analysis method, however, we reproduced the two most commonly reported clusters of multimorbidity (mental health disorders and cardiometabolic disease), which shows the strength of the principal component analysis method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, each cluster has a probability of association, rather than a clear membership assignment. Due to the probabilistic nature of the class assignment, it may be difficult to derive instance-level associations, thus a single instance may belong marginally to multiple classes 32 , 33 . Alternatively, k-means allows for a characterization of clusters driven by centroid-based distances, allowing for a quantitative estimate of the membership 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We subsequently evaluated the performance of each model, with the objective of determining the optimal fit for the data and the greatest possible distinction between the identified clusters. We utilized several statistical measures to evaluate the quality of the model fit, including the log likelihood plot, which indicates the point at which the log likelihood ceases to increase significantly, and the elbow heuristic for the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC), where the change in successive values becomes less noticeable (Supplementary Table S3 and Figure S1) [18][19][20][21]. To gauge the extent of the distinction between latent clusters, an entropy value was used, where a value of ≥0.6 was indicative of favorable separation between the groups [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%