2016
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00813-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latency-Associated Nuclear Antigen E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Activity Impacts Gammaherpesvirus-Driven Germinal Center B Cell Proliferation

Abstract: Viruses have evolved mechanisms to hijack components of cellular E3 ubiquitin ligases, thus modulating the ubiquitination pathway. However, the biological relevance of such mechanisms for viral pathogenesis in vivo remains largely unknown. Here, we utilized murid herpesvirus 4 (MuHV-4) infection of mice as a model system to address the role of MuHV-4 latency-associated nuclear antigen (mLANA) E3 ligase activity in gammaherpesvirus latent infection. We show that specific mutations in the mLANA SOCS box (V199A, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that the presence of multiple TR elements (each of which contains LBS1-2) in MHV68 results in enhanced cooperative binding and/or other oligomerization events that increase binding efficiency which may allow kLANA to efficiently mediate episome maintenance of mTR DNA and virus persistence. For instance, despite mutations that engendered severe mLANA DNA binding deficiency to mLBS1-2, mLANA efficiently mediated episome persistence in the setting of a full complement of mTRs in MHV68 [ 62 ]. Further, the finding of large, recombinant 4TR and 8TR episomes here (Figs 1 and 2 ; S1 and S2 Figs), and as previously observed[ 7 , 63 , 64 ] likely reflects the need for ~40 TR elements, similar to that of KSHV, for optimal functional efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is likely that the presence of multiple TR elements (each of which contains LBS1-2) in MHV68 results in enhanced cooperative binding and/or other oligomerization events that increase binding efficiency which may allow kLANA to efficiently mediate episome maintenance of mTR DNA and virus persistence. For instance, despite mutations that engendered severe mLANA DNA binding deficiency to mLBS1-2, mLANA efficiently mediated episome persistence in the setting of a full complement of mTRs in MHV68 [ 62 ]. Further, the finding of large, recombinant 4TR and 8TR episomes here (Figs 1 and 2 ; S1 and S2 Figs), and as previously observed[ 7 , 63 , 64 ] likely reflects the need for ~40 TR elements, similar to that of KSHV, for optimal functional efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutation of this region significantly attenuates latency and reduces reactivation (51)(52)(53). mLANA also carries an E3 ligase domain essential for GC B cell expansion (54). Conservation between mLANA and kLANA facilitated studies examining precise domains of kLANA crucial for in vivo function (55)(56)(57) and revealed that kLANA and mLANA are functionally interchangeable for episome maintenance (58,59).…”
Section: Mhv68 Latency-associated Nuclear Antigenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, NF-κB signaling is likely downregulated during specific phases of infection, as both mLANA and MHV-68 RTA target NF-κB subunit RelA/p65 for degradation. Mutation of the mLANA E3L domain abrogates MHV68-driven GC B cell infection, implicating mLANA E3L activity in GC B cell proliferative expansion ( 54 ). Toll-like receptor (TLR)-induced NF-κB activation disrupts an established latency program to increase genome-positive cells or reactivation in vivo ( 70 ).…”
Section: Phases Of the Mhv68 Life Cycle In Vivomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MHV68 LANA targets NF-κB via E3 ubiquitin ligase activity for degradation. Loss of this function enables mLANA to support latency but blocks expansion in the germinal center compartment [ 181 ]. The viral M2 has route-dependent roles in latency establishment and reactivation, and drives IL-10 production and plasma cell differentiation upon expression in primary B cells [ 144 , 163 , 182 ].…”
Section: Germinal Center Processes That Shape B Cell Evolution Andmentioning
confidence: 99%