2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latency and geofence testing of wireless emergency alerts intended for the ShakeAlert® earthquake early warning system for the West Coast of the United States of America

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings proved that facilitation conditions are positively moderated between trustworthiness and ITU5G argument supported by multiple studies 12 , 95 . A past study 96 discussed that information acquisition in the context of 5G technology refers to learning about and comprehending its characteristics, advantages, and potential drawbacks. Users can gain trustworthy information with the support of clear guidelines, regulations, and communication from regulatory organizations, which may favourably impact their decision to use 5G 53 .…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings proved that facilitation conditions are positively moderated between trustworthiness and ITU5G argument supported by multiple studies 12 , 95 . A past study 96 discussed that information acquisition in the context of 5G technology refers to learning about and comprehending its characteristics, advantages, and potential drawbacks. Users can gain trustworthy information with the support of clear guidelines, regulations, and communication from regulatory organizations, which may favourably impact their decision to use 5G 53 .…”
Section: Discussion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculate a maximum possible warning time for each station as the time between when GRAPES predicts shaking above the threshold and ground motion above that threshold occurs. We include 1 s of processing time in our warning time estimates but do not account for alert delivery times (McBride et al., 2023). We compare GRAPES's performance to the Propagation of Local Undamped Motion (PLUM) algorithm (Kodera et al., 2018), a ground motion‐based EEW algorithm currently in use in Japan (Kodera et al., 2020), and to a hypothetical and unrealistic (Minson et al., 2018) “perfect” algorithm, which exactly predicts shaking at all locations at the instant rupture begins (Figures 4a–4c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, PLUM is designed considering a threshold‐based approach to alert performance, where the relative over‐ or underestimation of ground‐motion amplitudes does not matter as much as whether alerts are received before target‐level shaking is experienced. This binary alert quality approach is the way that many users perceive EEW system performance (Santos‐Reyes, 2019), and is reflected in ShakeAlert by the lack of predicted shaking intensity information in the alert message issued to the public (McBride et al., 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the moveout distributions for different MMI exceedances determined this velocity to be appropriate for estimating exceedance times for target thresholds of MMI 3.5 and higher and yields conservative warning time estimates for target thresholds of MMI 5.0 and higher (Cochran et al., 2022). While the ShakeAlert Testing Platform simulates real‐time data streams by sending station data to the EEW algorithms in one‐second packets, it does not include data telemetry latencies or additional latencies from alert delivery, both of which can range from <1 s to several seconds or more (McBride et al., 2023; Patel & Allen, 2022; Stubailo et al., 2021). Alert recipients will also take time to process the alert message and take protective actions, which will also vary depending on the recipient.…”
Section: Simulated Real‐time Tests and Cost‐reduction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%