2005
DOI: 10.1590/s0034-70942005000300005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latência da lidocaína a 1% para anestesia infiltrativa da pele

Abstract: RESUMOAlmeida GP, Boos GL, Alencar TG, Oliveira Filho GR -Latência da Lidocaína a 1% para Anestesia Infiltrativa da Pele JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: U n i t e r m o s : C O M P L I C A Ç Õ E S , D o r : p u n ç ã o l o m b a r ; TÉCNICAS ANESTÉSICAS, Infiltrativa SUMMARY

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of hyaluronidase, evaluated in the 15 studies sources [7,14,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] regardless of the type and concentration of LA, hyaluronidase dose and regional blocking technique, was considered a protective factor against ocular akinesia failure in ophthalmic surgery (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32-0.93; p=0.027), as shown in Figure 2. (5 studies [14,19,20,22,23]; OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.09-1.34; p=0.12) or in PB (10 studies [7,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]21,24]; OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.40-1.07; p=0.09). Still on the hyaluronidase dose, regardless of the type and concentration of LA and the regional blocking technique, the use of a dose greater than 100 IU / mL was considered a protective factor, as it prevented akinesia failure in ophthalmic anesthesia (7 studies [7,14,16,18,19,21,22]; OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.20-0.90; p=0.02) (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of hyaluronidase, evaluated in the 15 studies sources [7,14,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] regardless of the type and concentration of LA, hyaluronidase dose and regional blocking technique, was considered a protective factor against ocular akinesia failure in ophthalmic surgery (OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.32-0.93; p=0.027), as shown in Figure 2. (5 studies [14,19,20,22,23]; OR: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.09-1.34; p=0.12) or in PB (10 studies [7,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]21,24]; OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.40-1.07; p=0.09). Still on the hyaluronidase dose, regardless of the type and concentration of LA and the regional blocking technique, the use of a dose greater than 100 IU / mL was considered a protective factor, as it prevented akinesia failure in ophthalmic anesthesia (7 studies [7,14,16,18,19,21,22]; OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.20-0.90; p=0.02) (Figure 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a disadvantage of bupivacaine relies in its more evident cardiotoxicity than lidocaine [27]. Lidocaine has a pKa closer to the physiological one, which implies shorter latency, faster onset of action, but also shorter duration, with the need to repeat supplementary doses, including intraoperatively [6,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%