Late ventricular potential for risk prediction of sudden cardiac death risk: a valuable tool or an unnecessary step?

Abstract

Background/Introduction Signal-averaged electrocardiography (SA-ECG) is a high-resolution electrocardiography that can detect late ventricular potential, which known to be a noninvasive tool for risk stratification of sudden cardiac death (SCD) by predicting reentrant ventricular tachyarrhythmia. There is a paucity of data with SA-ECG on SCD survivors without structural heart disease, whereas majority of previous studies had been focused on post myocardial infarction survivors. Purpose This study assessed the clinical utility of SA-ECG as a risk stratification modality for lethal arrhythmic event in patients at risk of SCD without definite structural heart disease. Methods Total 629 patients who experienced or had potential risk of SCD were studied with SA-ECG. Among them, 48 patients who were found to have significant structural heart disease were excluded, except arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. Major arrhythmic event (MAE) was defined as composite of all-cause death, aborted SCD, and sustained VT during any time either before visit of clinic or during follow up period. Syncope and non-sustained VT was defined as non-major arrhythmic event. SA-ECG was defined positive when fulfilling three or more criterion: (1) unfiltered QRS duration ≥114ms, (2) filtered QRS duration ≥114ms, (3) duration of terminal QRS <40uV exceeding 40ms, and (4) root mean square voltage in the terminal 40ms of ≤20ms. Results Among total 581 patients, 145 patients with positive SA-ECG showed higher incidence of MAE compared to patients with negative SA-ECG (21.4% vs. 6.7%, OR 3.816 [95% CI 2.208–6.597], p<0.001, Table). As the number of positive SA-ECG criteria increases, incidence of MAE tended to increase sequentially, which was markedly noted from 2 positive to 3 positive criteria (10.7% to 20.8%, p<0.001, Figure). In particular, patient with inherited arrhythmia showed higher rate of positive late potential compared to those with non-inherited arrhythmia (51.0% vs. 19.3%, p<0.001). Conclusion This study showed that at least 3 out of 4 diagnostic criteria in SA-ECG can independently predict lethal arrhythmic events and the positive late potential was associated with lethal arrhythmic event that leads to SCD, suggesting risk prediction for SCD using SA-ECG in patients even without structural heart disease including inherited arrhythmias. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.