“…This is in contrast to strong plumes, characterized by an ascending velocity of the buoyant column larger than that of wind. Weak plumes are significantly more frequent and, when associated with long-lasting eruptions, can not only affect local communities but also cause prolonged disruptions in the global air traffic, with effects that go far beyond the direct impacts on the air transport industries (Ernst et al, 1994;Guffanti et al, 2010;Miller and Casadevall, 2000;Prata and Tupper, 2009;Rose et al, 1995;Scollo et al, 2009;O'Regan, 2011).Strong and weak plumes are characterized by significantly different dynamics (e.g., Morton et al, 1956;Briggs, 1969;Turner, 1973;Wright et al, 1984;Sparks, 1986;Carey and Sparks, 1986;Coelho and Hunt, 1989;Bursik, 2001) and result in very different tephra deposits (e.g., Ernst et al, 1994, Bonadonna et al, 2005. As a result, empirical and theoretical relations that link plume height and MER for strong plumes (e.g., Wilson and Walker, 1987;Sparks, 1986;Mastin et al, 2009) cannot be easily extrapolated to weak plumes, making the realtime characterization of the source term even more complex (Degruyter and Bonadonna, 2012).…”