1943
DOI: 10.1130/gsab-54-1549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Pleistocene Coast Range orogenesis in southern California

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1951
1951
1980
1980

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the age of the Coast Range orogeny is generally considered to be middle or late Pleistocene (Eaton, 1928;Reed and Hollister, 1936;Stille, 1936;Putnam, 1942;Bailey, 1943;Taliaferro, 1943), within the area studied it can be dated only as post Tulare. The Tulare generally is accepted as being of Pliocene and Pleistocene ( ~) age, and if this is the age of the Tulare in western Fresno County, then the foothill belt and probably the main Diablo Range were elevated during Pleistocene time.…”
Section: The Coast Range Orogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the age of the Coast Range orogeny is generally considered to be middle or late Pleistocene (Eaton, 1928;Reed and Hollister, 1936;Stille, 1936;Putnam, 1942;Bailey, 1943;Taliaferro, 1943), within the area studied it can be dated only as post Tulare. The Tulare generally is accepted as being of Pliocene and Pleistocene ( ~) age, and if this is the age of the Tulare in western Fresno County, then the foothill belt and probably the main Diablo Range were elevated during Pleistocene time.…”
Section: The Coast Range Orogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Middle to late Pleistocene fossils have been found in tilted and folded strata in southern California, and some of these beds have been tilted by minor earth movements since the Coast Range orogeny (Bailey, 1943) . Movements younger than the Coast Range orogeny also affected the Diablo Range causing changes in the development of alluvial fans as will be shown later.…”
Section: The Coast Range Orogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"The deposition of these late Pliocene and early Pleistocene beds [the Tulare formation] was brought to a close by an even more important and widespread diastrophic event [the Coast Range orogeny] than that through which they originated" (Taliaferro, 1943, p. 148). Although the age of the Coast Range orogeny is generally considered to be middle or late Pleistocene (Eaton, 1928;Reed and Hollister, 1936;Stille, 1936;Putnam, 1942;Bailey, 1943;Taliaferro, 1943), within the area studied it can be dated only as post-Tulare. The Tulare generally is accepted as being of Pliocene and Pleistocene age; therefore, the foothill belt and probably the main Diablo Range were elevated during Pleistocene time.…”
Section: The Coast Range Orogenymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, a group of deformations during middle and late Miocene time appears to have been important, to have deformed the earlier Cenozoic strata widely, and to have restricted the areas of subsequent sedimentation. A final climax of deformation occurred during Quaternary time, mainly during the gap between the lower and upper Pleistocene deposits (Stille, 1936, p. 867-868;Bailey, 1943Bailey, , p. 1562Bailey, -1564.…”
Section: California and Baja Californiamentioning
confidence: 99%