2011
DOI: 10.1130/b30371.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Ordovician (Chatfieldian) catastrophic volcanism and abrupt carbonate platform-interior subsidence: A tectonic link across a Taconian foreland basin (Quebec Embayment) due to inherited crustal weakness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, some of these same faults also sustained motion at Cambrian-Ordovician boundary time (Jacobi et al, 2006) and Knox unconformity time (e.g., Bradley and Kidd, 1991). To the north in Quebec, Taconic subsidence is proposed to have been guided by reactivated Neoproterozoic/ Iapetan-opening faults, some of which were also reactivated around the time of the Cambrian-Ordovician boundary and during the hiatus associated with the Knox unconformity (Dix and Rodhan, 2006;Salad Hersi and Dix, 2006;Dix and Al-Dulami, 2011;Dix and Jolicoeur, 2011;Gbadeyan and Dix, 2013). Further, faults observed on seismic refl ection data in Quebec sup-port the contention that Iapetan-opening faults were reactivated during Taconic foreland basin subsidence, since the throw on the basal Cambrian nonconformity is greater than the throw on the Ordovician units (e.g., Séjourné et al, 2002).…”
Section: Foreland Basin Subsidence: Implications For Structure and Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, some of these same faults also sustained motion at Cambrian-Ordovician boundary time (Jacobi et al, 2006) and Knox unconformity time (e.g., Bradley and Kidd, 1991). To the north in Quebec, Taconic subsidence is proposed to have been guided by reactivated Neoproterozoic/ Iapetan-opening faults, some of which were also reactivated around the time of the Cambrian-Ordovician boundary and during the hiatus associated with the Knox unconformity (Dix and Rodhan, 2006;Salad Hersi and Dix, 2006;Dix and Al-Dulami, 2011;Dix and Jolicoeur, 2011;Gbadeyan and Dix, 2013). Further, faults observed on seismic refl ection data in Quebec sup-port the contention that Iapetan-opening faults were reactivated during Taconic foreland basin subsidence, since the throw on the basal Cambrian nonconformity is greater than the throw on the Ordovician units (e.g., Séjourné et al, 2002).…”
Section: Foreland Basin Subsidence: Implications For Structure and Tementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Ottawa Embayment, an upper Chatfieldian bentonite in the Verulam Formation is correlated across the Laurentian platform from margin to the interior Michigan Basin [30]. The stratigraphic position of this bentonite correlates shallowing in the upper Verulam Formation in the northern Appalachian Basin with abrupt subsidence and backstepping (~50 km) of the Laurentian margin along the Quebec Embayment [30].…”
Section: Stratigraphic Response To Eustasy or Tectonics?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The stratigraphic position of this bentonite correlates shallowing in the upper Verulam Formation in the northern Appalachian Basin with abrupt subsidence and backstepping (~50 km) of the Laurentian margin along the Quebec Embayment [30]. Above this marker unit, the upper Verulam Formation and the Lindsay Formation thicken from the western Ottawa Embayment seaward into southern Quebec [30] where the latter formation is equivalent to the shaley Tetreauville Formation [36,37].…”
Section: Stratigraphic Response To Eustasy or Tectonics?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The angular, bimodal-polymodal, poorly sorted and platykurtic characteristics of the sediment grains suggest deposition from a suspension cloud, short distance of transport and quick burial. Given the grain size, modality (Dix and Al-Dulami, 2011),…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%