2007
DOI: 10.1080/00288250709509739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Oligocene‐Early Miocene leaf macrofossils confirm a long history ofAgathisin New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is, however, unclear if the drifting island was emergent during the entire drifting process. Similarly, there is debate about what fraction of the biota survived the high Oligocene sea levels in New Zealand and New Caledonia (Pole, 1994;Cooper & Cooper, 1995;Hickson et al, 2000;Lee et al, 2001Lee et al, , 2007McGlone et al, 2001;Landis et al, 2008).…”
Section: The Shuttle Theory (Vicariance)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, however, unclear if the drifting island was emergent during the entire drifting process. Similarly, there is debate about what fraction of the biota survived the high Oligocene sea levels in New Zealand and New Caledonia (Pole, 1994;Cooper & Cooper, 1995;Hickson et al, 2000;Lee et al, 2001Lee et al, , 2007McGlone et al, 2001;Landis et al, 2008).…”
Section: The Shuttle Theory (Vicariance)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because A. australis is the only New Zealand species in this clade, there is no evidence from these molecular studies for a deep divergence within New Zealand, and, thus, no strong support from this work that the lineage has been present in Zealandia since its separation from Australia. The fossil record also provides no clear evidence that Agathis was present soon after the separation; the earliest definitive New Zealand Agathis fossils are from the late Oligocene (Lee et al 2007;Pole 2008). A plausible alternative is that the ancestors of A. australis dispersed from Australia to Zealandia after those landmasses separated, but that the Australian lineages closest to A. australis subsequently became extinct (Biffin et al 2010).…”
Section: Conservative Bias With Respect To Inferring Long-distance DImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amber was derived from araucarian source trees which have a fossil record from the Late Cretaceous through to the present day in New Zealand based on pollen, foliage and wood fossils (Lindqvist, 1986;Lee et al, 2007Lee et al, , 2012Lee et al, , 2016a. It is most likely to have been produced by one or more extinct species of Agathis Salisb.…”
Section: Source Trees and Plant Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%