2008
DOI: 10.1144/sp297.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Neoproterozoic carbonate productivity in a rifting context: the Adoudou Formation and its associated bimodal volcanism onlapping the western Saghro inlier, Morocco

Abstract: An interval of episodic carbonate productivity, lithostratigraphically recognized as the ‘Calcaires inférieurs’ (upper member of the Adoudou Formation), took place across the Neoproterozoic–Cambrian transition onlapping the western Saghro inlier, Morocco. Sedimentation of the ‘Calcaires inférieurs’ was highly variable: in relatively stable substrates, a peritidal-dominated mixed platform is recorded where deposition was primarily controlled by autocyclic processes and accommodation space availability, whereas,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At the stratotype of the Taghdout Group, the δ 13 C background values of carbonate interbeds range from −2 to +1‰, with a negative shift from background conditions of 4 to 6‰, whereas the fluctuations of δ 18 O values range from −8·2 to −18·6‰. In the Adoudou Formation, δ 13 C values vary between −4‰ and 0‰ in the Tabia Member, and between −6‰ and +7‰ in the Tifnout Member, except for some anomalous data from the Tagrara inlier (Maloof et al ., ; Álvaro et al ., ). Hydrothermally affected carbonates of the Tabia Member display δ 13 C values from −0·2 to −3·7‰, whereas their karstic infill (speleothems) range from −8·2 to −8·6‰ (Álvaro, ).…”
Section: Geochemistry Of Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the stratotype of the Taghdout Group, the δ 13 C background values of carbonate interbeds range from −2 to +1‰, with a negative shift from background conditions of 4 to 6‰, whereas the fluctuations of δ 18 O values range from −8·2 to −18·6‰. In the Adoudou Formation, δ 13 C values vary between −4‰ and 0‰ in the Tabia Member, and between −6‰ and +7‰ in the Tifnout Member, except for some anomalous data from the Tagrara inlier (Maloof et al ., ; Álvaro et al ., ). Hydrothermally affected carbonates of the Tabia Member display δ 13 C values from −0·2 to −3·7‰, whereas their karstic infill (speleothems) range from −8·2 to −8·6‰ (Álvaro, ).…”
Section: Geochemistry Of Carbonatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Synsedimentary tectonism during deposition of the Tabia Member is manifest regionally by dramatic, directional variations in thickness, regional angular unconformities, and abrupt lateral and vertical changes in lithofacies that reflect differential subsidence of fault-bounded blocks. It is also indicated by gravitational slides at several localities (Soulaimani et al, 2001;Álvaro et al, 2008a), which attest to abrupt changes in local slope and/or episodic seismicity associated with synsedimentary faulting neighbouring inherited palaeohighs and pre-Pan-African inliers. Indeed, synsedimentary faulting profoundly influenced regional bathymetric changes and submarine palaeotopography during each rifting pulse.…”
Section: Palaeogeographic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This episode was linked to a WNW-ESE true extension, associated with a network of NW-facing NE-SW normal faults and the onset of a N30°fissure system. Fault-controlled, differential subsidence during this rifting pulse is also supported by: (i) marked variations in thickness and lateral discontinuity of the Tabia lithofacies regionally (Demange, 1980;Chbani et al, 1999;Algouti et al, 2000;Benssaou and Hamoumi, 2001); (ii) measurements of slump folds and olistostromes neighbouring active faults and inherited escarpments, which indicate development of local slopes of variable facing directions (Piqué et al, 1995(Piqué et al, , 1999Álvaro et al, 2008a); and (iii) contemporaneous deposition of submarine escarpment-derived breccias (Demange, 1980;Soulaimani et al, 2001Soulaimani et al, , 2003. As a result, the Tabia strata accumulated not on an intact, uniformly subsiding segment of the Souss basin (southern High Atlas and Anti-Atlas platforms), but instead on a basin composed of a mosaic of differently subsiding, fault-bounded crustal blocks facing a northern basinal seafloor preserved, at present, in the northern Coastal Meseta (see a recent discussion in Álvaro et al (2008b)).…”
Section: Palaeogeographic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…). During deposition of the Tabia Member, some grabens dropped down significantly relative to adjacent uplifts and inherited Proterozoic inliers, and slope‐related, alluvial and fluvial sediments accumulated to great thickness in the troughs (Piqué et al ., , ; Algouti et al ., ; Soulaimani et al ., , ; Pouclet et al ., ); meanwhile, dike intrusion and local volcanic eruptions took place within the rift valleys (Álvaro et al ., ; Ezzouhairi et al ., ). As pointed out by Maloof et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%