2023
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.3587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Mortality After COVID-19 Infection Among US Veterans vs Risk-Matched Comparators

Theodore J. Iwashyna,
Sarah Seelye,
Theodore S. Berkowitz
et al.

Abstract: ImportanceDespite growing evidence of persistent problems after acute COVID-19, how long the excess mortality risk associated with COVID-19 persists is unknown.ObjectiveTo measure the time course of differential mortality among Veterans who had a first-documented COVID-19 infection by separately assessing acute mortality from later mortality among matched groups with infected and uninfected individuals who survived and were uncensored at the start of each period.Design, Settings, and ParticipantsThis retrospec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because our data were collected via survey, we did not include individuals who had died, which may violate target trial emulation conditioned on postrandomization information. 27 We have previously measured that the population-weighted differences in mortality, 25 which could introduce censoring of the extreme phenotype bias. 31 Our study was further limited by the small sample size, which was partially due to a lower-than-expected recruitment rate, which has been seen in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because our data were collected via survey, we did not include individuals who had died, which may violate target trial emulation conditioned on postrandomization information. 27 We have previously measured that the population-weighted differences in mortality, 25 which could introduce censoring of the extreme phenotype bias. 31 Our study was further limited by the small sample size, which was partially due to a lower-than-expected recruitment rate, which has been seen in other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We present analyses among individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection who were alive 18 months after onset and did not adjust for death in these estimates, as mortality analyses have been published separately. 25 To assess robustness, we also reanalyzed the outcomes without applying weights and, separately analyzed the outcomes without removing any individuals with a history of COVID-19 prior to survey. We also conducted hypothesis-generating post hoc analyses 26 , 27 separately by whether or not the COVID-19 cohort was hospitalized within 7 days of their first positive test.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early estimates of US excess mortality were higher than official COVID-19 deaths 2,3 , suggesting undercounted COVID-19 mortality and/or increases in other causes of death during the pandemic. COVID-19 may also have longer-term impacts on mortality risk after acute infection or due to disruptions in health care delivery, resulting in persistent excess mortality 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enduring impact of COVID-19 extends beyond physical and mental health issues to include increased mortality. Iwashyna et al found that individuals who had contracted COVID-19 faced a twofold increase in mortality risk within 2 years compared to those not infected with SARS-CoV-2 5 . The risk of long-term mortality is affected by factors such as age and the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 infection 6,7 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%