2013
DOI: 10.1057/9781137003423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Modernity, Individualization and Socialism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But we infer that this relationship is somewhat related to executive decisions at the individual level. Because pushing mechanisms at the executive level and individualized work decision structures reward talent and originality rather than entrenched advantages (Banks and Milestone, 2011; Dawson, 2013), individuals and male-dominated executive groups can also lead to aggressive strategic orientation. Because even if group information processing differs from individual executive processing, the group can be affected by influential executive individuals (Finkelstein et al ., 2009; George and Chattopadhyay, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But we infer that this relationship is somewhat related to executive decisions at the individual level. Because pushing mechanisms at the executive level and individualized work decision structures reward talent and originality rather than entrenched advantages (Banks and Milestone, 2011; Dawson, 2013), individuals and male-dominated executive groups can also lead to aggressive strategic orientation. Because even if group information processing differs from individual executive processing, the group can be affected by influential executive individuals (Finkelstein et al ., 2009; George and Chattopadhyay, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neoliberalism, in the first instance, can be seen as a theory of 'political economic practices that proposes that human well-being can best be advanced by liberating individual entrepreneurial freedoms and skills within an institutional framework characterized by strong private property rights, free markets, and free trade' (Harvey 2005, 2). The role of the state is to create and preserve processes of privatisation, marketisation, and lessening regulation (Harvey, 2005;Olssen and Peters 2005;Dawson 2013). States must take such actions because, in a global economy, they are forced to compete for capital by developing attractive markets for investment (Strange 1994).…”
Section: China and Neoliberalismmentioning
confidence: 99%