2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Miocene diversification and phylogenetic relationships of the huge toads in the Rhinella marina (Linnaeus, 1758) species group (Anura: Bufonidae)

Abstract: We investigated the phylogeny and biogeography of the Rhinella marina group, using molecular, morphological, and skin-secretion data, contributing to an understanding of Neotropical faunal diversification. The maximum-parsimony and Bayesian analyzes of the combined data recovered a monophyletic R. marina group. Molecular dating based on Bayesian inferences and fossil calibration placed the earliest phylogenetic split within the R. marina group at ∼ 10.47 MYA, in the late Miocene. Two rapid major diversificatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
54
1
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(93 reference statements)
7
54
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Pramuk 2006). As a definite outgroup we employed a sample of Rhinella poeppigii (Tschudi, 1845) from a distant species group of the Rhinella marina species group (Pramuk 2006; Maciel et al 2010). Our dataset was further supplemented by sequences from GenBank to include representatives of all earlier published genetic lineages of the Rhinella margaritifera species group (Pramuk 2006; Fouquet et al 2007a, 2012a, b; Jansen et al 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pramuk 2006). As a definite outgroup we employed a sample of Rhinella poeppigii (Tschudi, 1845) from a distant species group of the Rhinella marina species group (Pramuk 2006; Maciel et al 2010). Our dataset was further supplemented by sequences from GenBank to include representatives of all earlier published genetic lineages of the Rhinella margaritifera species group (Pramuk 2006; Fouquet et al 2007a, 2012a, b; Jansen et al 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we defined three groups: i) R. marina sequences were divided in the two different geographic groups of populations, RAB and LAB; and, ii) all R . schneideri sequences were defined as a group, The toads R. icterica and R. arenarum were used as outgroups [24,25]. The input file for *BEAST was created using the application BEAUti [82] and partitions and models were edited by hand to fit models for each unlinked nuclear fragment, as determined with Kakusan4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These species are morphologically similar (but diagnosable by the presence of tibial glands in R. schneideri ) and have essentially a parapatric distribution, but may occur in sympatry along ecological transitions between humid and dry forests (Figure 1). Previous phylogenetic analyses of the R. marina group based on mtDNA [24,25] suggested a division in two major clades: one including R. veredas , R. cerradensis , R. jimi , R. marina , R . schneideri , and R. poeppigii (north-central clade), and another including R. arenarum , R. rubescens , R. achavali , and R. icterica (south-central clade).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studied species belong to the R. marina group and are phylogenetically close to each other. The group contains 10 species distributed throughout different habitats from Texas to Uruguay (11). R. jimi (Stevaux, 2002) are originally from xeric environments (Brazilian Caatinga region) and face temperatures from 20°C to more than 40°C.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%