2015
DOI: 10.1130/g36735.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Glacial and Holocene glacier fluctuations at Nevado Huaguruncho in the Eastern Cordillera of the Peruvian Andes

Abstract: Discerning the timing and pattern of late Quaternary glacier variability in the tropical Andes is important for our understanding of global climate change. Terrestrial cosmogenic nuclide (TCN) ages (48) on moraines and radiocarbon-dated clastic sediment records from a moraine-dammed lake at Nevado Huaguruncho, Peru, document the waxing and waning of alpine glaciers in the Eastern Cordillera during the past ~15 k.y. The integrated moraine and lake records indicate that ice advanced at 14.1 ± 0.4 ka, during the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the reasons outlined in Section 3.1, many studies take the oldest boulder age-within a cluster of boulder ages for a given moraine and after the exclusion of outliers attributed to nuclide inheritance-to be the closest to the timing of the glacier advance (e.g., Zech et al, 2006Zech et al, , 2007aZech et al, ,b, 2009bZech et al, , 2010Hall et al, 2009;May et al, 2011). On the contrary, some studies instead (i) calculate mean values of all boulder ages collected on a moraine (Licciardi et al, 2009;Shakun et al, 2015b;Stansell et al, 2015Stansell et al, , 2017Bromley et al, 2016;Martini et al, 2017); (ii) calculate average boulder ages using frequency density plots (Smith and Rodbell, 2010;Jomelli et al, 2011;Smith et al, 2011;Ward et al, 2015); (iii) organise ages chronologically and take the plateau or modal age (Smith et al, 2005a,b) or (iv) combine these various approaches . As our results for the Sierra de Aconquija demonstrate (see Section 4.1), these different approaches could, in some cases, result in substantially different moraine ages (and consequently palaeoclimate interpretations) for an identical set of boulder ages.…”
Section: Andesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the reasons outlined in Section 3.1, many studies take the oldest boulder age-within a cluster of boulder ages for a given moraine and after the exclusion of outliers attributed to nuclide inheritance-to be the closest to the timing of the glacier advance (e.g., Zech et al, 2006Zech et al, , 2007aZech et al, ,b, 2009bZech et al, , 2010Hall et al, 2009;May et al, 2011). On the contrary, some studies instead (i) calculate mean values of all boulder ages collected on a moraine (Licciardi et al, 2009;Shakun et al, 2015b;Stansell et al, 2015Stansell et al, , 2017Bromley et al, 2016;Martini et al, 2017); (ii) calculate average boulder ages using frequency density plots (Smith and Rodbell, 2010;Jomelli et al, 2011;Smith et al, 2011;Ward et al, 2015); (iii) organise ages chronologically and take the plateau or modal age (Smith et al, 2005a,b) or (iv) combine these various approaches . As our results for the Sierra de Aconquija demonstrate (see Section 4.1), these different approaches could, in some cases, result in substantially different moraine ages (and consequently palaeoclimate interpretations) for an identical set of boulder ages.…”
Section: Andesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newly published data from the Cordillera Carabaya (Bromley et al, 2016) and Nevado Huaguruncho (Stansell et al, 2015) were calculated by the authors using the Quelccaya production rates. We also use radiocarbon ages in the compilation by Rodbell et al (2009), combined with more recent publications for the Cordillera Huayhuash , Cordillera Raura (Stansell et al, 2013), and Nevado Huaguruncho (Stansell et al, 2015) (Table 2). LGM (>42 ka); currently small glaciers remain on Cerro Chuchpanga to west of Junin.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of Illimani (Smith et al, 2011), ages were not available in the Shakun et al (2015a) composite, and we recalculated with the Quelccaya 10 Be production rate calibration (Kelly et al, 2015), and the CRONUS-Earth calculator version 2.3 with the time-invariant 'St' scaling method of Stone (2000) following Lal (1991). Newly published data from the Cordillera Carabaya (Bromley et al, 2016) and Nevado Huaguruncho (Stansell et al, 2015) were calculated by the authors using the Quelccaya production rates. We also use radiocarbon ages in the compilation by Rodbell et al (2009), combined with more recent publications for the Cordillera Huayhuash , Cordillera Raura (Stansell et al, 2013), and Nevado Huaguruncho (Stansell et al, 2015) (Table 2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations