2013
DOI: 10.2113/econgeo.108.4.641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Cretaceous to Middle Eocene Magmatism and Metallogeny of a Portion of the Southeastern Anatolian Orogenic Belt, East-Central Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Geochronological information in the form of 40 Ar/ 39 Ar radiometric ages from both the igneous and metamorphic complexes indicate ages of about 43-44 Ma which agree with the Eocene age concluded from stratigraphic studies [4].…”
Section: Geological Background Of the Study Areasupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Geochronological information in the form of 40 Ar/ 39 Ar radiometric ages from both the igneous and metamorphic complexes indicate ages of about 43-44 Ma which agree with the Eocene age concluded from stratigraphic studies [4].…”
Section: Geological Background Of the Study Areasupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The emplacement of the granitoids is assumed to have taken place in a back-arc setting [3] or in a postcollisional geotectonic environment [4].…”
Section: Geological Background Of the Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Zircon U‐Pb dating reveals an emplacement age of 78–73 Ma for CAT15‐11 (Kuşcu et al, ). Although the crystallization age of CAT15‐10 is not directly constrained, a similar age can be presumed based on U‐Pb and Ar/Ar ages of 78–65 Ma from compositionally similar syenite intrusions located ~20–30 km north of this sample (Boztuğ et al, ; Kuşcu et al, ; Parlak et al, ). CAT15‐10 has statistically identical AFT and AHe cooling ages of 27.8 ± 1.9 and 28.2 ± 0.4 Ma, respectively (Figure ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17]. The formation of these deposits is associated with alpine orogeny [18], while [19] compares these with recent occurrences of mid-ocean ridges.…”
Section: Regional Geologymentioning
confidence: 99%