1987
DOI: 10.1130/0091-7613(1987)15<462:lctetd>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Cretaceous to early Tertiary ductile deformation: Catalina-Rincon metamorphic core complex, southeastern Arizona

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of data is common in southeastern Arizona because faults commonly are poorly exposed, and fault‐related folding may not be apparent if only basement rocks are exposed (e.g., Nickerson et al, ). In southeastern Arizona, Laramide reverse faults and ductile fabrics, regardless of shortening style, are largely interpreted to have either east or northeast transport directions (e.g., Bykerk‐Kauffman & Janecke, ; Richard & Spencer, ; Waldrip, ). East‐directed compression may be more consistent with Sevier‐style, thin‐skinned deformation for the region, whereas east‐northeast‐directed compression is more indicative of Laramide‐style, thick‐skinned tectonics (Yonkee & Weil, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This lack of data is common in southeastern Arizona because faults commonly are poorly exposed, and fault‐related folding may not be apparent if only basement rocks are exposed (e.g., Nickerson et al, ). In southeastern Arizona, Laramide reverse faults and ductile fabrics, regardless of shortening style, are largely interpreted to have either east or northeast transport directions (e.g., Bykerk‐Kauffman & Janecke, ; Richard & Spencer, ; Waldrip, ). East‐directed compression may be more consistent with Sevier‐style, thin‐skinned deformation for the region, whereas east‐northeast‐directed compression is more indicative of Laramide‐style, thick‐skinned tectonics (Yonkee & Weil, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A proposed regional thrust sheet, ~6 km thick, is invoked to explain penetrative deformation observed in footwall rocks. This thrust is possibly thought to be linked to other reverse faults observed in the northern Catalina Mountains, such as the Edgar and Youtcy faults (locations 8 and 9 in Figure ), as suggested by northeast‐directed Laramide shear fabrics (Bykerk‐Kauffman & Janecke, ; Gehrels & Smith, ).…”
Section: Structural Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The model of oceanic detachment faults rooting in ductile levels is closely related to that developed for continental core complexes. Continental detachments are characterized by a wide (>250 m) zone of pervasive ductile deformation, and a progressive localization of the deformation with a transition to brittle deformation overprinting the previous ductile fabric [e.g., Miller et al , 1983; Bykerk‐Kauffman and Janecke , 1987; Lee and Lister , 1992; Mueller and Snoke , 1993]. Although high‐temperature ductilely deformed peridotites and gabbros have been sampled in proximity to oceanic detachments [e.g., Cannat et al , 1992; Jaroslow et al , 1996; Karson , 1999], they are mainly sampled along nearby transform valley walls and are probably associated with the transform fault instead of detachment faulting, although there is little information on the orientation of such deformation zones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where such mapping was not undertaken, or where it accompanied by only a local study, the common resulting conclusion is of a single stage of gravity-generated detachment faults. In many other studies (Reynolds, 1980(Reynolds, , 1982Bykerk-Kauffman and Janeke, 1987), however, the multistaged development is recognized, with the Miocene detachment event being the last one. Even where no Paleozoic or Mesozoic cover rocks intervene between the brittlely deformed Tertiary deposits and ductily deformed basement rocks, the juxtaposition of these diverse styles of deformation must be viewed as enigmatic.…”
Section: Geologic Settingmentioning
confidence: 95%