1986
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1986)97<859:lcsdai>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Cretaceous stratigraphy, deformation, and intrusion in the Madison Range of southwestern Montana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During 70 million to 65 million years ago (latest Cretaceous), it predicts a belt of slow shortening that extends from western Montana south through Utah to eastern Arizona. This corresponds nicely to some of the more western Laramnide structures: the Blacktail-Snowcrest and Madison ranges in Montana were formed in the latest Cretaceous (24,25), and thrust faulting in southern Arizona is also partly Cretaceous in age (26). The central part of this belt overlaps the preexisting Overtrust Belt from the waning Sevier orogeny, which in fact experienced its last major shortening about 70 million years ago (27).…”
Section: Comparison To Geologic Historysupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During 70 million to 65 million years ago (latest Cretaceous), it predicts a belt of slow shortening that extends from western Montana south through Utah to eastern Arizona. This corresponds nicely to some of the more western Laramnide structures: the Blacktail-Snowcrest and Madison ranges in Montana were formed in the latest Cretaceous (24,25), and thrust faulting in southern Arizona is also partly Cretaceous in age (26). The central part of this belt overlaps the preexisting Overtrust Belt from the waning Sevier orogeny, which in fact experienced its last major shortening about 70 million years ago (27).…”
Section: Comparison To Geologic Historysupporting
confidence: 62%
“…This suggests that removal oflithosphere by horizontal subduction is the key factor that controls the extent and timing of the Basin-and-Range taphrogeny. 25 MARCH I988…”
Section: Comparison To Geologic Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the site of the present study in and near the Madison Range, ~35 km east of the Blacktail-Snowcrest uplift, the onset of deformation and volcanism was synchronous with the ~79-Ma basal deposits of the Upper Cretaceous Livingston Formation (Tysdal, 1990) and continued during deposition of the Upper Cretaceous Sphinx Conglomerate, which contains an unroofing sequence of clasts (becoming older stratigraphically upwards) shed from the hanging wall of the Hillgard thrust system (DeCelles et al, 1987). Deformation had essentially ceased by latest Cretaceous time (~69 Ma), the apparent age of the dacite sills and dikes that intrude both the Sphinx Conglomerate and the thrusts of the Hillgard thrust system (Tysdal et al, 1986, and this study). Farther east and south, in the ancestral Teton, Gros Ventre, and Wind River Ranges of Wyoming, Laramide deformation began in Late Cretaceous time and continued through most of the Paleocene (Dorr et al, 1977;Perry et al, 1992).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 63%
“…1) (Kellogg and Williams, 2000). Previous studies showed that one sill, dated at 68-69 Ma, intrudes Laramide thrust planes of the Hilgard thrust system, suggesting that thrusting ceased by latest Cretaceous time (Tysdal et al, 1986). However, it is possible that sill injection accompanied early thrusting and associated folding, as paleomagnetic directions from Late Cretaceous (~77 Ma) sills along the southern margin of the Helena salient of the Montana thrust belt in the Jefferson Canyon Traverse Zone have been shown to pre-date Laramide thrusting (Harlan et al, 2002;Harlan et al, unpublished data).…”
Section: Paleomagnetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The Livingston and Maudlow Formations of southwest Montana (Figure 2) were chosen for study because their location to the east of the most disturbed part of the western Cordillera should produce undisturbed cratonic magnetizations, and the ages assigned to the formations are latest Cretaceous (Parsons, 1942;Marvin and Dobson, 1979;Langston, 1985;Skipp and McGrew, 1977;Skipp and Peterson, 1965;Vhay, 1939 were taken from andesitic to dacitic welded tuffs or lapilli-tuffs in the lower part of the formation (Langston, 1985;Parsons, 1942;Vhay, 1939). The rocks are Campanian in age, based on stratigraphic correlation with sedimentary rocks in the basin, and a radiometric date of 79.8 +_ 2.9 Ma (Tysdal et al, 1986). The sampling area in the Livingston Formation is adjacent to the northem flank of the Beartooth Range, a Laramide foreland uplift block.…”
Section: G•logic Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%