2022
DOI: 10.1130/b36438.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Cretaceous−early Paleogene rise of the Gangdese magmatic arc (south Tibet) from sea level to high mountains

Abstract: Recognition of the existence of an Andean-type continental margin in southern Tibet prior to its collision with India has provided crucial constraints on the formation of the Tibetan Plateau and South Asian climate evolution. Here, we focused on well-dated Late Cretaceous successions in the Linzhou Basin and determined the elevation changes from sea level to high mountains in the Gangdese magmatic arc in southern Tibet. Our results show that the Linzhou Basin was still submerged in the Tethyan Sea at around 92… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gangdese magmatic arc is believed to have achieved an elevation of approximately three kilometres by the late Upper Cretaceous (Ding et al., 2014, 2022; Murphy et al., 1997; Xu et al., 2022). Topography of the arc massif played a considerable role in Cenozoic climate change of the interior Tibetan Plateau by enhancing the monsoonal climate system and acting as an orographic barrier to Neo‐Tethys Ocean moisture sources to the south (DeCelles et al., 2007; Ding et al., 2014; Spicer, 2017; Spicer et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2022). In ancient active‐margin settings, the sedimentary records within forearc and retroarc strata are excellent proxies for arc magmatism, paleotopography of the arc, and regional drainage patterns between the arc and associated basins (Barth et al., 2013; Capaldi et al., 2021; de Silva et al., 2015; DeGraaff‐Surpless & Graham, 2002; Malkowski, Schwartz, et al., 2017; Schwartz et al., 2021; Sharman et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Gangdese magmatic arc is believed to have achieved an elevation of approximately three kilometres by the late Upper Cretaceous (Ding et al., 2014, 2022; Murphy et al., 1997; Xu et al., 2022). Topography of the arc massif played a considerable role in Cenozoic climate change of the interior Tibetan Plateau by enhancing the monsoonal climate system and acting as an orographic barrier to Neo‐Tethys Ocean moisture sources to the south (DeCelles et al., 2007; Ding et al., 2014; Spicer, 2017; Spicer et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2022). In ancient active‐margin settings, the sedimentary records within forearc and retroarc strata are excellent proxies for arc magmatism, paleotopography of the arc, and regional drainage patterns between the arc and associated basins (Barth et al., 2013; Capaldi et al., 2021; de Silva et al., 2015; DeGraaff‐Surpless & Graham, 2002; Malkowski, Schwartz, et al., 2017; Schwartz et al., 2021; Sharman et al., 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gangdese magmatic arc is believed to have achieved an elevation of approximately three kilometres by the late Upper Cretaceous (Ding et al., 2014, 2022; Murphy et al., 1997; Xu et al., 2022). Topography of the arc massif played a considerable role in Cenozoic climate change of the interior Tibetan Plateau by enhancing the monsoonal climate system and acting as an orographic barrier to Neo‐Tethys Ocean moisture sources to the south (DeCelles et al., 2007; Ding et al., 2014; Spicer, 2017; Spicer et al., 2021; Xu et al., 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation