2019
DOI: 10.2478/medu-2019-0010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Cognitive Impairment After Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery: Opportunities in Rehabilitation with the Use of Computer-Based Training

Abstract: In spite of recent significant advances in reduction of mortality and disability, coronary heart disease (CHD) remains widespread both in Russia and around the world. Coronary bypass graft surgery (CABG) has proved to be the most effective method of CHD treatment, providing that conservative therapy is not effective enough. The aim of the present study was to reveal and correct postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD), developed under the conditions of cardiopulmonary bypass (CB) in patients with CHD within … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(31 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Another 8 studies were fair, meaning they were susceptible to some bias considered not sufficient to invalidate their results. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] One was considered poor. 45 Limitations of the studies included in this review were inconsistent operational definitions for cognitive impairment and diagnostic criteria, domains of cognition assessed, choice of cognitive tests, timing of assessments, and surgical procedure (sample sizes for patients undergoing valve repair or replacement were very small, and none included only valve procedures).…”
Section: Study Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…10,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] Another 8 studies were fair, meaning they were susceptible to some bias considered not sufficient to invalidate their results. [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] One was considered poor. 45 Limitations of the studies included in this review were inconsistent operational definitions for cognitive impairment and diagnostic criteria, domains of cognition assessed, choice of cognitive tests, timing of assessments, and surgical procedure (sample sizes for patients undergoing valve repair or replacement were very small, and none included only valve procedures).…”
Section: Study Appraisalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 19 included studies, 3 each were in Germany, 32,41,42 the United States, 30,33,35 the United Kingdom, 10,34,44 and Iran [36][37][38] ; 2 each in Croatia 28,29 and Russia 43,45 ; and 1 each in Korea, 39 Canada, 40 and Turkey. 31 Most studies were single-site (n = 16) 10,[28][29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]42,43,45 pilot studies (n = 7), 10,30,31,34,39,40,42 with small samples of less than 150 participants (n = 13) [29][30][31][33][34][35][36][37]…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations