2002
DOI: 10.1029/2000tc001246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Late Cenozoic evolution of the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau: Inferences from 40Ar/39Ar and (U‐Th)/He thermochronology

Abstract: [1] High topography in central Asia is perhaps the most fundamental expression of the Cenozoic Indo-Asian collision, yet an understanding of the timing and rates of development of the Tibetan Plateau remains elusive. Here we investigate the Cenozoic thermal histories of rocks along the eastern margin of the plateau adjacent to the Sichuan Basin in an effort to determine when the steep topographic escarpment that characterizes this margin developed. Temperaturetime paths inferred from 40 Ar/ 39 Ar thermochronol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

36
488
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 513 publications
(528 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(160 reference statements)
36
488
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Clift and Sun (2006) suggested that the sedimentation rates in the Y-SH Basin increased sharply at the end of the Miocene. Clark et al (2005) used an initiation of the major river incisions to identify the timing of the initial uplift at 13e9 Ma and the high erosion rates between 0.23 and 0.47 mm/yr, and the result does coincide with the thermochronology data published by Xu and Kamp (2000) and Kirby et al (2002). Gong and Li (2004) found that the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau since 10 Ma has had an important influence on the climate and sedimentary environment of the South China Sea, and the thick infill of the Y-SH Basin has been supplied by paleo-Red River delta during the Late Miocene.…”
Section: Tectonic Implicationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For example, Clift and Sun (2006) suggested that the sedimentation rates in the Y-SH Basin increased sharply at the end of the Miocene. Clark et al (2005) used an initiation of the major river incisions to identify the timing of the initial uplift at 13e9 Ma and the high erosion rates between 0.23 and 0.47 mm/yr, and the result does coincide with the thermochronology data published by Xu and Kamp (2000) and Kirby et al (2002). Gong and Li (2004) found that the uplift of the Tibetan Plateau since 10 Ma has had an important influence on the climate and sedimentary environment of the South China Sea, and the thick infill of the Y-SH Basin has been supplied by paleo-Red River delta during the Late Miocene.…”
Section: Tectonic Implicationmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau along the Long Men Shan is almost as abrupt as the southern margin along the Himalaya, but the two show very different geology (Kirby et al 2002). The eastern part of Tibet shows no evidence of major Late Cenozoic crustal shortening, no evidence of post-collisional metamorphism or middle-lower crustal flow as seen along the Himalaya, and no flexural foreland basin to the east.…”
Section: Continuum Modelsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Maggi et al (2000), Jackson (2002), Priestley & McKenzie (2006) and Priestley et al (2008) found no convincing evidence for substantial seismicity in the continental upper mantle, and proposed instead that the deep earthquakes in the eastern Himalaya occurred along the crust-mantle boundary or within the lowermost crust fig. 1 (Kirby et al 2002).…”
Section: Lithospheric Delamination or Underthrusting?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current estimates for when the QTP reached its current elevation are based on inferences regarding the initiation age of east-west extension in central and southern Tibet (Coleman and Hodges 1995;Harrison et al 1992) or potassic volcanism in north central Tibet (Hacker et al 2000) sometime during the early Miocene (~23 Ma BP). Regardless of the conceptually compelling nature of these geodynamic models, a temporal and genetic link between structural extension, volcanism and uplift is yet to be thoroughly demonstrated (Kirby et al 2002).…”
Section: Regional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work on erosion rates inferred from 10 Be analysis indicate erosion rates of 1-4 mm yr -1 in the Namche Barwa region and 0.14-0.58 mm yr -1 for incised regions east of the TRR (see Figure 2; Booth et al 2004;Burg et al 1997;Ding et al 2001;Finnegan et al 2008;Malloy 2004;Ouimet et al 2009;Reid et al 2005;Seward and Burg 2008;Stewart et al 2008). Exhumation rates indicate that parts the eastern margin of the QTP have been as high as 10 mm yr -1 for at least the last 1 to 10 Ma (Arne et al 1997;Clark et al 2005b;Enkelmann et al 2006;Godard et al 2009;Kamp 2000;Kirby et al 2002). Towards the east of the TRR, exhumation rates derived from biotite 40 Ar/ 39 Ar, apatite and zircon U-Th/He, and apatite fission track thermochronometry for incised regions indicate rates of 0.25 and 0.65 mm yr -1 since 9-13 Ma (Henck et al 2011).…”
Section: Regional Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%