“…Traditionally, the strategy for depthecology ranking of planktonic taxa was twofold: (1) comparison with modern morphological counterparts (small, simple, globular, Globigerina-like groups are attributed to the shallow-dwelling assemblage, whereas large, ornamented, flattened, Globorotalia-like groups are attributed to the deep-dwelling assemblage [Hart 1980[Hart , 1999Caron and Homewood 1983;Premoli Silva and Sliter 1999]); and (2) biogeographic distributions (taxa common in epicontinental shelf settings are attributed to the shallow-dwelling assemblage, whereas taxa that dominated in pelagic settings are attributed to the deep-dwelling assemblage [Hart and Bailey 1979;Leckie 1987]). Although these approaches have long been considered appropriate and were generally supported by available stable isotope data, a growing number of exceptions have been documented by recent measurements of glassy foraminifera (Norris and Wilson 1998;Wilson and Norris 2001;Bornemann and Norris 2007;Petrizzo et al 2008). For example, the Albian genus Planomalina, which by its single-keeled morphology would be identified as a thermocline dweller, exhibits isotopic features of an upper-ocean habitat.…”