Quantum Electronics 1969
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-012238-0.50009-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The formula (3.27) is the extension of (3.29) for a quantum perturbation of the form (1.2). The spectral power, which, for a classical stationary random function, is just the Fourier transform of the correlation function, is replaced here by the quantum symmetric correlation function [14]. The energy relaxation rate due to reservoir fluctuations is exactly what we would expect on a physical basis : it is the power absorbed by 8 when it is driven by reservoir fluctuations.…”
Section: Relaxation Rates Of Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The formula (3.27) is the extension of (3.29) for a quantum perturbation of the form (1.2). The spectral power, which, for a classical stationary random function, is just the Fourier transform of the correlation function, is replaced here by the quantum symmetric correlation function [14]. The energy relaxation rate due to reservoir fluctuations is exactly what we would expect on a physical basis : it is the power absorbed by 8 when it is driven by reservoir fluctuations.…”
Section: Relaxation Rates Of Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the emission process is completed, the angular momentum ends in the lower level J, -J & # x 3 E ; . Vacuum fluctuation effects play again a very important role ; they exactly balance the energy loss due to self reaction, ensuring the stability of the ground state [14]. Appendix A.…”
Section: Early Stage Of the Emission Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The canonical variables are p = n ω 1 n 0 ω 3 and q = ϕ 1 + ϕ 2 − 2ϕ 3 , where ϕ j are the phases of complex amplitudes, n ω j are the photon flux densities in the corresponding modes, and the normalization n 0 ω 3 corresponds to the boundary value of the pump photon flux density. The parameters are 2 = (n ω 1 − n ω 2 )/n 0 ω 3 , 3 = (n ω 3 /2 + n ω 1 )/n 0 ω 3 , χ is the coupling coefficient for the four-wave mixing, κ EIT is the standard coefficient of absorption of the probe wave in the regime of electromagnetically induced transparency, D = 1 ν 0 (ω 21 21 is the frequency of the transition 1-2 (see Fig. 1), and 0 R is the boundary value of the pumping wave Rabi frequency.…”
Section: B Generalization Of the Universal Model Of Nonlinear Resonamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…,ω M due to the dependence of the function U( P) on polarization in any odd power. Thus, taking into account the cubic nonlinearity, i.e., δP (3) ∝ E 3 , is usually sufficient for the description of this effect [20,21]. Moreover, under the condition of frequency synchronism Eq.…”
Section: Appendix A: Excitation Of Polarization In a Nonlinear Anisotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with this problem one must start from the kinetic equation for the density matrix (T of the spin system, from which under certain conditions the rate equations can be derived [6]. The kinetic equation itself follows from the Liouville equation for the density matrix of the closed system of spins and phonons (we shall consider the phonon system as a thermostat with the constant temperature T).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%