2023
DOI: 10.3390/ma16041614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser Welding Penetration Monitoring Based on Time-Frequency Characterization of Acoustic Emission and CNN-LSTM Hybrid Network

Abstract: In-process penetration monitoring of the pulsed laser welding process remains a great challenge for achieving uniform and reproducible products due to the highly complex nature of the keyhole dynamics within the intense laser-metal interactions. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility of acoustic emission (AE) measurement for penetration monitoring based on acoustic wave characteristics and deep learning. Firstly, a series of laser welding experiments on aluminum alloys were conducted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2023, Luo et al [20], addressed the persistent challenge of in-process penetration monitoring in pulsed laser welding, crucial for achieving uniform and reproducible products amidst the intricate dynamics of keyhole formation during intense laser-metal interactions. This study aimed to explore the viability of acoustic emission measurement for penetration monitoring through an innovative combination of acoustic wave characteristics and deep learning.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2023, Luo et al [20], addressed the persistent challenge of in-process penetration monitoring in pulsed laser welding, crucial for achieving uniform and reproducible products amidst the intricate dynamics of keyhole formation during intense laser-metal interactions. This study aimed to explore the viability of acoustic emission measurement for penetration monitoring through an innovative combination of acoustic wave characteristics and deep learning.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This high workload cannot be omitted by sample generation using, e.g., finite-elementmethod simulation. This is the case because in simulations for fixed sets of parameters, the same results will always be obtained [26][27][28]. During welding for the same set of parameters, slightly different results are gathered due to differences in the material structure or temporary changes in process conditions [29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Yet, as the authors of [17][18][19] suggest, relying on statistical measures alone is not sufficient for classifying different weld characteristics. On the other hand, the emerging number of machine learning approaches [20][21][22] utilize signal structure, yielding higher classification accuracy than solely based on signal energy or statistical measures. However, the correlation of acoustic emissions and weld-relevant parameters is imperceptible for human visual inspection [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%