1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-57966-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser Remote Sensing of Vegetation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Development of quantitative assessment is required. Another laser ranging method (e.g., Kanevski et al 1994) measures the time or phase differences of laser beams to obtain two-dimensional sections of the three-dimensional structure of the forest canopy. Because this method does not measure strength of laser reflections, an ordinary passive radiometer system is required to be adapted to determine the spectral characteristics of the canopy (e.g., Yamashita et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of quantitative assessment is required. Another laser ranging method (e.g., Kanevski et al 1994) measures the time or phase differences of laser beams to obtain two-dimensional sections of the three-dimensional structure of the forest canopy. Because this method does not measure strength of laser reflections, an ordinary passive radiometer system is required to be adapted to determine the spectral characteristics of the canopy (e.g., Yamashita et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, if a lidar system is used that can receive the returned laser energy in a direction different from the incident beam direction, a hot spot interaction term as a function of incident and returned directions must be added to (1). The use of such bistatic lasers (although not lidars) to plant canopy analysis has been described by [11].…”
Section: Letmentioning
confidence: 99%