2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1143/1/012020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser power influence on Raman spectra of multilayer graphene, multilayer graphene oxide and reduced multilayer graphene oxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The response of rGO sample was similar to the unannealed hdG sample and showed almost no dependence on the laser power. Contrary to us, Ferreira et al [77] observed a decrease in D/G band ratio with increasing power, λ L = 532 nm, in the range from 0.5 to 3 mW in samples of multilayer graphene oxide (MLGO) and reduced MLGO. These materials also exhibited the shift of G band position and increase of its FWHM with increasing laser power, while mechanically exfoliated multilayer graphene showed no such dependence.…”
Section: Fingerprint Behavior Of Gsg Nanosheets During High Laser Pow...contrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The response of rGO sample was similar to the unannealed hdG sample and showed almost no dependence on the laser power. Contrary to us, Ferreira et al [77] observed a decrease in D/G band ratio with increasing power, λ L = 532 nm, in the range from 0.5 to 3 mW in samples of multilayer graphene oxide (MLGO) and reduced MLGO. These materials also exhibited the shift of G band position and increase of its FWHM with increasing laser power, while mechanically exfoliated multilayer graphene showed no such dependence.…”
Section: Fingerprint Behavior Of Gsg Nanosheets During High Laser Pow...contrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Methylene blue (MB), also called methylthionine chloride, is an organic dye with the molecular formulation C 16 H 18 N 3 Cl 1 S 1 and a molecular weight of 319.85 g/mol. Its maximum absorbance is at 663 nm [ 54 ]. The absorbance analysis of the samples after exposure to UV light was performed in the range of 460–750 nm as shown in Figure 11 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two stages can be distinguished by looking at additional Raman parameters, such as the Γ of selected peaks, because the Γ increases for increasing defect concentration [38,39,41] and strain [42,43]. Directly comparing measurements between different instruments can also be challenging, as factors such as laser excitation energy [48,49], laser power [50], instrument calibration, microscope objectives [51], slit width and grating can affect Raman peak positions, peak widths and peak intensity ratios. An important example of this is the difference in the D peak position and intensity for the same graphene sample when using different excitation lasers, as it is strongly dispersive with excitation energy due to a Kohn Anomaly at K [48,[52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%