Analysis, Design and Evaluation of Man–Machine Systems 1988 1989
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-036226-7.50038-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser Pointer Based Task-Level Control for Heavy Duty Machines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Oulu times, the areas of interest included interactive and autonomous control of robots and mobile working machines (for example Pieskä, Elsilä & Vähä 1988;Pieskä, Mäkynen, Kostamovaara, Elsilä, & Myllylä 1989;Pieskä, Heikkilä, Riekki, Taipale, Känsälä & Röning 1991). These topics also continued to be interesting in the applied research projects of this study.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the Oulu times, the areas of interest included interactive and autonomous control of robots and mobile working machines (for example Pieskä, Elsilä & Vähä 1988;Pieskä, Mäkynen, Kostamovaara, Elsilä, & Myllylä 1989;Pieskä, Heikkilä, Riekki, Taipale, Känsälä & Röning 1991). These topics also continued to be interesting in the applied research projects of this study.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The demonstration of easy robot programming technology is saved in the CENTRIA virtual digital media library and it can also be seen in YouTube (search centriard). The idea of external measurement device based interaction in robot programming is not new (Halme, Heikkilä, Torvikoski 1987;Hasegawa 1982;Manninen 1984;Pieskä et al 1988), but in the 1980s there was lack of feasible measurement devices, lack of computer power and industrial robot control systems were at that time not open enough for external programming. VTT has also recently been developing a method based on an interactive 3D sensor system for robotic applications (Heikkilä, Ahola, Viljamaa, Järviluoma 2010).…”
Section: Figure 17 Comparison Of Robot Work Cell Calibration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%