1982
DOI: 10.1021/ac00239a030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser photoacoustic detection of nitrogen dioxide in the gas-phase titration of nitric oxide with ozone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(13 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar calculations and experimental checks were performed at 250 K and 350 K. While the NO2 limits are somewhat more conservative at these temperature extremities than at 296 K we are able to place, at most a 5% uncertainty on our complete set of measurements due to the reaction of OH with NO2. This upper limit on NO2 impurity levels in our reaction mixtures was confirmed by actual measurements on similarly prepared samples using optoacoustic detection of NO2 upon irradiation by an argon ion laser at 488.0 nm [Fried and Hodgeson, 1982]. Thus any differences between the present work and the earlier (temperature invarient) studies cannot be attributed to NO2 (either as an initial impurity or generated by HONO2 decomposition).…”
Section: The Initial 296 K Experiments Performed With the Large Teflsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Similar calculations and experimental checks were performed at 250 K and 350 K. While the NO2 limits are somewhat more conservative at these temperature extremities than at 296 K we are able to place, at most a 5% uncertainty on our complete set of measurements due to the reaction of OH with NO2. This upper limit on NO2 impurity levels in our reaction mixtures was confirmed by actual measurements on similarly prepared samples using optoacoustic detection of NO2 upon irradiation by an argon ion laser at 488.0 nm [Fried and Hodgeson, 1982]. Thus any differences between the present work and the earlier (temperature invarient) studies cannot be attributed to NO2 (either as an initial impurity or generated by HONO2 decomposition).…”
Section: The Initial 296 K Experiments Performed With the Large Teflsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Several other investigators reported significant biases between GPT and UV photometry. Higher O 3 values assayed by GPT than by UV photometry have often been observed [ Hodgeson , 1976; Rehme et al , 1981; Fried and Hodgeson , 1982]. For example, Fried and Hodgeson [1982] conducted a 1‐year study of GPT in comparison with UV absorption measurements of O 3 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This minimizes the possibility of side reactions involving NO 2 , NO 3 , and N 2 O 5 that might occur if conditions of excess O 3 were used. Having one of the reactants in excess, rather than say having NO and O 3 at equivalent levels, will also tend to drive the reaction to completion, allowing us to take advantage of the stoichiometry of the following reaction [e.g., DeMore and Patapoff , 1976; Fried and Hodgeson , 1982]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The error in the resulting calibration constant is principally driven by the uncertainty in the calibration source mixing ratio and the subsequent passing efficiency of NO 2 through regulators, flow controllers and other tubing. Experiments at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have shown agreement to within 1.0% between NO 2 permeation tube standards (Fried & Hodgeson, 1982) (a gravimetric standard exhibiting a combined standard uncertainty of 0.2% at 1 ppm) and the NO 2 cylinder standards commonly used for field calibrations, in this case Scott Specialty Gas, 10 ppm . In our laboratory, NO 2 standards (2-50 ppmv) have been compared to each other regularly over a three-year period.…”
Section: Calibration Of Lif No 2 Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%