1997
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.56.r1095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser-noise-induced heating in far-off resonance optical traps

Abstract: Using a simple model, we calculate the heating rates arising from laser intensity noise and beam-pointing fluctuations in far-off resonance optical traps. Intensity noise causes exponential heating, while beam-pointing noise causes heating at a constant rate. The achievement of heating time constants well beyond 10 sec imposes stringent requirements on the laser noise power spectra. Noise spectra are measured for a commercial argonion laser to illustrate the expected time scales.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
279
1
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(298 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
14
279
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If the Gaussian beam is modulated, the equilibrium position will shake accordingly. When the modulation frequency is equal to the intrinsic trap frequency of single atoms, shaking will increase the oscillation amplitude and lead to heating [26,27]. It indicates that the radial oscillation frequency of single atoms in the BFORT is increased to 150 kHz, which agrees reasonably well with the theoretical expectation.…”
Section: Experimental Demonstration For the Lamb-dicke Trapsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the Gaussian beam is modulated, the equilibrium position will shake accordingly. When the modulation frequency is equal to the intrinsic trap frequency of single atoms, shaking will increase the oscillation amplitude and lead to heating [26,27]. It indicates that the radial oscillation frequency of single atoms in the BFORT is increased to 150 kHz, which agrees reasonably well with the theoretical expectation.…”
Section: Experimental Demonstration For the Lamb-dicke Trapsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In Figure 5(b), we scan the off time from 2 s to 20 s to get the probabilities of atoms still in, and then fit the curve with an exponential decay function. Under our experimental conditions, the 1/e lifetime of single atoms is about 11.4 s due to collisions with untrapped background atoms in the ultrahigh vacuum chamber and heating mechanisms caused by intensity fluctuations and photon scattering of the FORT light [24][25][26].…”
Section: The Lifetime Of Single Atomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laser intensity and pointing fluctuations can cause undesirable heating in FORTs [37]. The heating rate due to intensity noise is…”
Section: Laser Noise Induced Heatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From first order perturbation theory, the rate of transition from the ground state of the well (|n = 0 ) to the first excited state (|n = 1 ) is [15] …”
Section: A Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%