2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-009-0668-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser marked shadowgraphy: a novel optical planar technique for the study of microbubbles and droplets

Abstract: A novel combination of backlighting and Glare Point Velocimetry and Sizing (GPVS) is proposed to measure the size distribution of microbubbles (or microdroplets). This new technique, which we will call Laser Marked Shadowgraphy or LMS, avoids sizing out-of-focus bubbles (or droplets) and the associated bias error. Compared to backlighting, this combination also improves the precision of the diameter measurement and allows void fraction measurements.Compared with GPVS, a more robust image processing is obtained… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a tele-centric setup was not used, the third source causing the error is associated with the calibration/magnification determination. According to the studies of Bongiovanni et al [49] and Dehaeck et al [50], an estimation of the maximum error in determining the bubble edge is ± 4.5 pixel. Hence, when the bubble diameter is in the range of 0.12-0.5 mm, the spatial resolution is 0.01 mm/pixel, the error will be in the range of ±9% to ± 37.49%.…”
Section: Experimental Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a tele-centric setup was not used, the third source causing the error is associated with the calibration/magnification determination. According to the studies of Bongiovanni et al [49] and Dehaeck et al [50], an estimation of the maximum error in determining the bubble edge is ± 4.5 pixel. Hence, when the bubble diameter is in the range of 0.12-0.5 mm, the spatial resolution is 0.01 mm/pixel, the error will be in the range of ±9% to ± 37.49%.…”
Section: Experimental Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such panoramic optical techniques as SP [29,30] and IPI [31e34] contributed to measuring the sizes (radii) of atomized water droplets (R d ¼ 0.05e0.35 mm). In the case of the SP method [29,30], the cross-correlation complex was additionally equipped with diffuse screen 24. This screen was connected to laser 18 by the optical fiber and applied to provide backlight for moving water droplets (Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental set-up, fig. 1, included four basic groups of equipment, -assembly for temperature measurements (items 2, 3), -equipment for monitoring and recording the parameters of droplet and high-temperature gas-flows (items 4-7), -tools for creating an atomized droplet flow (items 8-10), and -tools for creating a high-temperature gas-flow (items [12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%