2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/abc040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser induced plasma characterization in direct and water confined regimes: new advances in experimental studies and numerical modelling

Abstract: Optimization of the laser shock peening (LSP) and LASer Adhesion Test (LASAT) processes requires control of the laser-induced target’s loading. Improvements to optical and laser technologies allow plasma characterization to be performed with greater precision than 20 years ago. Consequently, the processes involved during laser–matter interactions can be better understood. For the purposes of this paper, a self-consistent model of plasma pressure versus time is required. The current approach is called the inver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference can be explained by the damaging of the confinement which causes the absorption of more incident laser energy during the shots as well as triggers the breakdown phenomenon sooner. These data were compared with the pressures obtained while using the code given in Scius-Bertrand et al work [24] and gave similar results.…”
Section: Pressure Measurementmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference can be explained by the damaging of the confinement which causes the absorption of more incident laser energy during the shots as well as triggers the breakdown phenomenon sooner. These data were compared with the pressures obtained while using the code given in Scius-Bertrand et al work [24] and gave similar results.…”
Section: Pressure Measurementmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Figure 3 shows the plasma pressure determined from backface velocity measurement depending on the incident laser intensity for pulse durations of 7 and 21 ns at 1064 nm wavelength. Pressures at 532 nm with water and solid confinement from [9] as well as pressures under water confined regime at 1053 nm with a 10 ns laser pulse from [24] are also reported. The pressure increases linearly for the two wavelengths up to 6 GW/cm 2 .…”
Section: Pressure Measurementmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thresholds were found to be I b,ω = 10 GW/cm²; I b,2ω = 6 GW/cm²; I b,3ω = 4 GW/cm² at 1064 nm, 532 nm and 355 nm, respectively, [26]. More recent experiments performed at 1064 nm and 532 nm, for a pulse duration of 7 ns, gave different results: I b,ω = 8 GW/cm² and I b,2ω = 10 GW/cm² [53].…”
Section: Breakdown Plasma Generationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, Scius‐Bertrand et al [ 60 ] proposed a self‐consistent model of shockwave pressure versus time through the inverse method and verified the accuracy of this model under multiple parameters, which further expand the application scope of the pressure prediction model.…”
Section: Fundamental Mechanisms Of Lspmentioning
confidence: 99%