2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Laser-induced fragmentation of carbonyl iron as a clean method to enhance magnetorheological effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sigmoidal shape of the graph is attributed to the relationship of magnetic twisting actuation with magnetization, polar moment of inertia, and densification . In particular, the shape of the curve mainly implies that the magnetic actuation requires higher magnetic flux density exceeding the threshold point, as described by a typical magnetization hysteresis loop . At m F = 1 (CCW, ■) and 2 (CW, ●), the twisted F 1 pillar has a large discrepancy of ϕ with the case at m F = 3 (CCW, □) and 4 (CW, ○), respectively (Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sigmoidal shape of the graph is attributed to the relationship of magnetic twisting actuation with magnetization, polar moment of inertia, and densification . In particular, the shape of the curve mainly implies that the magnetic actuation requires higher magnetic flux density exceeding the threshold point, as described by a typical magnetization hysteresis loop . At m F = 1 (CCW, ■) and 2 (CW, ●), the twisted F 1 pillar has a large discrepancy of ϕ with the case at m F = 3 (CCW, □) and 4 (CW, ○), respectively (Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…19 In particular, the shape of the curve mainly implies that the magnetic actuation requires higher magnetic flux density exceeding the threshold point, as described by a typical magnetization hysteresis loop. 30 At m F = 1 (CCW, ■) and 2 (CW, •), the twisted F 1 pillar has a large discrepancy of ϕ with the case at m F = 3 (CCW, □) and 4 (CW, ○), respectively (Table S2). However, in the cases of m S = 1 (CCW, ■) and 2 (CW, •), ϕ values are nearly identical to those at m S = 4 (CCW, □) and 5 (CW, ○), respectively, at B ranging from 0.05 to 0.6 T (Figures 2c-iii and S7c,d).…”
Section: Design Of Flower Corolla-like Arraysmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This drawback has to be suppressed in order to develop MR fluids suitable for industrial applications [ 10 ]. Several approaches have been developed to enhance stability and thereby avoid gravitational settling, including: (i) encapsulating magnetic particles within organic/inorganic coatings, or even multi-shell layers, in order to reduce bulk density and heighten interactions with the liquid medium [ 11 , 12 ]; (ii) applying magnetic/non-magnetic nano-particles (NPs) that act as physical barriers to inhibit settling [ 13 , 14 , 15 ]; (iii) replacing the carrier medium with viscous liquids [ 16 ] or gel-like media [ 17 ]; and (iv) dispersing special types of particles, i.e., hollow/porous particles [ 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employing them can enhance yield stress, MR performance and the sedimentation profile. 13,14 An important factor concerns the amount of NPs applied for this purpose, since a "halo" effect occurs beyond a certain threshold (usually at above 5%), weakening the field-induced structures. 14 Various types of NPs, either magnetic or non-magnetic, in different forms, such as spherical, 13 rod-/needle-like 15 and plate-like 16 have been extensively…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%